Loading...
Loading...
Found 955 Skills
Verify cross-component wiring: exports are imported AND used, real data flows through connections, output shapes match input expectations. Use after /feature-implement, before /feature-validate, or standalone on any codebase. Use for "check integration", "verify wiring", "are components connected", "integration check", or "/integration-checker". Do NOT use for unit test failures, linting, or single-file correctness issues.
Run Python (ruff) and JavaScript (Biome) linting, formatting, and code quality checks with auto-fix support. Use when code needs linting, formatting, or style checking before commits. Use for "lint", "format", "ruff", "biome", "code style", or "check quality". Do NOT use for comprehensive code review (use systematic-code-review).
This skill should be used when the user asks to "audit this codebase", "audit this code", "security audit", "code audit", "find vulnerabilities", "check for bugs", "review code quality", "find dead code", "check for anti-patterns", "performance audit", "check for code smells", "technical debt", or "code health check".
Run Claude Code review against the current branch, fix only the review comments that are still valid for the current codebase, and leave invalid comments unchanged.
Full delivery pipeline: plan, build, ship, settle. Covers: shape/spec/design, TDD build, commit, PR creation, PR fix (CI/reviews/conflicts), PR polish, simplify, test coverage, verify ACs, walkthrough, issue management. Use when: shipping features, fixing PRs, creating PRs, building issues, simplifying code, checking quality, writing commits, managing issues. Trigger: /autopilot, /build, /shape, /commit, /issue, /check-quality, /test-coverage, /verify-ac, /pr-walkthrough.
Discover and understand project rules, coding standards, and architectural guidelines before starting a task. Use when you need to know the constraints, patterns, or compliance requirements for a feature, file, or technology.
Umbrella skill for agent work discipline across development, analysis, and documentation: inspect the repo before restructuring, keep durable truth in repo artifacts instead of chat memory, co-evolve specs/design/steering/user docs with code, apply sound coding patterns, verify work honestly, avoid shortcuts, work efficiently with subagents without hallucinating, and keep moving through the next concrete work item when the human is away. References cover coding patterns, AI-authored code review, and artifact co-evolution. Trigger when the user asks for workflow discipline, coding patterns, doc/artifact maintenance, code review of AI-authored code, project hygiene, execution guardrails, repo normalization, or when a task risks drifting across architecture, storage, specs, continuity, or tooling boundaries.
Aggressively clean up a codebase by removing AI slop, dead code, weak types, defensive over-engineering, duplication, and legacy cruft. Orchestrates 8 specialized subagents in parallel to deduplicate code, consolidate types, kill unused code, untangle circular dependencies, strengthen weak types, remove unnecessary try/catch, delete deprecated/legacy paths, and strip unhelpful comments. Use when the user asks to 'clean up the codebase', 'remove slop', 'improve code quality', 'remove dead code', 'kill AI slop', 'tighten types', 'remove legacy code', 'deduplicate code', 'DRY this up', 'untangle dependencies', or wants a thorough code quality pass. Also use when the user mentions code smells, technical debt cleanup, or refactoring for clarity — even if they don't use the word 'slop'.
Follow this sub-process for code optimization — handle tasks where 'behavior remains unchanged but structure changes' (structure / performance / readability). Shift single-module internal optimization from 'AI random refactoring' to 'first scan to generate a checklist, confirm each item with the user, execute step by step according to the method library, and obtain manual approval for each step'. Trigger scenarios: When the user mentions phrases like 'optimize / refactor / rewrite / split / poor performance / too long code' without any accompanying behavior changes. Do not handle new requirements (route to feature), bugs (route to issue), or cross-module architecture restructuring (route to architecture + decisions).
Launch an isolated Claude reviewer for the current branch, a specific commit, or uncommitted changes. Uses Claude's agent runtime with worktree isolation so the review has an independent read-only view of the code before findings are reported back.
Review changed code for reuse, quality, and efficiency, then fix any issues found.
Code review and audit system with specialized sub-skills covering SOLID principles, security, performance, architecture, error handling, testing, code smells, design patterns, and framework best practices. Generates severity-scored findings with copy-pasteable fix prompts. Strictly read-only — never modifies user code. Use when user says "review", "audit", "code review", "check my code", "security scan", "code smells", "SOLID check".