Loading...
Loading...
Found 198 Skills
Comprehensive documentation of Claude's capabilities for visual regression testing, CI/CD integration, and quality assurance automation. Use when setting up testing infrastructure, implementing visual regression, or understanding agent testing capabilities. (project)
Unvarnished technical criticism combining Linus Torvalds' precision, Gordon Ramsay's standards, and James Bach's BS-detection. Use when code/tests need harsh reality checks, certification schemes smell fishy, or technical decisions lack rigor. No sugar-coating, just surgical truth about what's broken and why.
Use this skill when you need to review test cases for completeness, clarity, maintainability, and missing scenarios; triggers include 'test case review' and 'test case review'.
Implement a task with automated LLM-as-Judge verification for critical steps
Detect non-deterministic (flaky) tests by reading CI run logs or test result history. Aggregates pass rates per test, identifies intermittent failures, recommends quarantine or fix, and maintains a flaky test registry. Best run during Polish phase or after multiple CI runs.
Run verification commands and confirm output before claiming success. Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs.
Help teams continuously improve skills, automatically identify skill optimization opportunities (such as missing essential information, format issues, version update needs, etc.), execute secure update processes (backup, modification, testing, restoration), and ensure skill quality keeps improving as the project progresses
Systematic methodology for debugging bugs, test failures, and unexpected behavior. Use when encountering any technical issue before proposing fixes. Covers root cause investigation, pattern analysis, hypothesis testing, and fix implementation. Use ESPECIALLY when under time pressure, "just one quick fix" seems obvious, or you've already tried multiple fixes. NOT for exploratory code reading.
Research-driven code review and validation at multiple levels of abstraction. Two modes: (1) Session review — after making changes, review and verify work using parallel reviewers that research-validate every assumption; (2) Full codebase audit — deep end-to-end evaluation using parallel teams of subagent-spawning reviewers. Use when reviewing changes, verifying work quality, auditing a codebase, validating correctness, checking assumptions, finding defects, reducing complexity. NOT for writing new code, explaining code, or benchmarking.
Run tests, linting, and quality checks for WooCommerce development. Use when running tests, fixing code style, or following the development workflow.
Guide to effective Claude Code skill authoring using TDD methodology and persuasion principles. Use when creating new skills, improving compliance, or validating quality before deployment. Do not use for evaluating existing skills (use skills-eval) or analyzing architecture (use modular-skills). Follow the Iron Law: write a failing test before writing any skill.
James Bach's HTSM Product Factors (SFDIPOT) analysis for comprehensive test strategy generation. Use when analyzing requirements, epics, or user stories to generate prioritized test ideas across Structure, Function, Data, Interfaces, Platform, Operations, and Time dimensions.