Loading...
Loading...
Found 66 Skills
UX critique — hierarchy, clarity, anti-slop. No code changes unless asked. Invoke when the user asks for critique on their UI, or mentions 'critique' alongside design / UI / frontend work.
Surfaces and assesses hidden assumptions behind decisions, designs, or recurring patterns — use when reviewing a design before committing, reflecting on recurring problems, or questioning why the same kinds of issues keep appearing
Set up the Inflight feedback widget, authenticate with the CLI, and share staging URLs for design review. Use when the user wants to collect design feedback, add Inflight to a project, or share a staging deployment for review.
Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, automated anti-pattern detection, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.
Run a 5-dimension expert design review on any HTML artifact in the project — Philosophy / Visual hierarchy / Detail / Functionality / Innovation, each scored 0–10. Outputs a single self-contained HTML report with a radar chart, evidence-backed scores, and three lists: Keep / Fix / Quick-wins. Use when the brief asks for a "design review", "design critique", "5 维度评审", "design audit", or "what's wrong with my design".
Revisa de forma adversarial un Technical Design Document y sus ADRs, buscando activamente huecos, riesgos y decisiones débiles en vez de validarlos. Use when the user asks to challenge, stress-test, get a second opinion on, or adversarially review a technical design document, architecture decisions, or ADRs.
Pencil Design Skill for Team Workflows (Phase 2). Produce design.pen (or declare no UI design) based on requirements and plans, and prepare G2 design review materials.
Review healthcare and EHR software interfaces against a comprehensive design style guide grounded in NIST, FDA, IEC 62366, ISO 9241, ISO 14971, WCAG 2.1, ONC SAFER, and HL7 FHIR standards. Produces a report-only assessment without modifying code or designs. Use when an agent needs to evaluate clinical UI screens, data display, forms, alerts, or workflows for patient-safety, usability, accessibility, and data-clarity compliance.
Interroge l'utilisateur sans relâche sur un plan ou un design jusqu'à atteindre une compréhension partagée, en résolvant chaque branche de l'arbre de décision. À utiliser quand l'utilisateur veut stress-tester un plan, se faire challenger sur son design, ou mentionne « grill me » / « interroge-moi » / « challenge-moi » / « questionne-moi ».
Run the full design-to-build workflow as a guided sequence. Orchestrates all designer skills in order, from grilling through review. Use when user wants to go through the complete design process, start a project from scratch, run the full flow, or mentions "design flow" or "full workflow".
Continuously question users about their plan or design. Suitable for scenarios where users want to stress-test their plan before building, or when using any "grill" trigger phrases.
This skill analyzes code for design quality improvements across 8 dimensions: Naming, Object Calisthenics, Coupling & Cohesion, Immutability, Domain Integrity, Type System, Simplicity, and Performance. Ensures rigorous, evidence-based analysis by: (1) Understanding code flow first via implementation-analysis protocol, (2) Systematically evaluating each dimension with specific criteria, (3) Providing actionable findings with file:line references. Triggers when users request: code analysis, design review, refactoring opportunities, code quality assessment, architecture evaluation.