Loading...
Loading...
Found 63 Skills
Agent skill for code-analyzer - invoke with $agent-code-analyzer
Comprehensive code review checklist for Go projects. Evaluates code quality, idiomatic patterns, error handling, naming, package structure, and test coverage. Use when reviewing Go code, PRs, or before merging changes. Trigger examples: "review this code", "check this PR", "code review", "review Go file". Do NOT use for security-specific audits (use go-security-audit) or performance-specific analysis (use go-performance-review).
Audit Android Jetpack Compose repositories for performance, state management, side effects, and composable API quality. Scans source code, scores each category from 0-10, writes a strict markdown report, and summarizes the most important fixes. Use when reviewing a Compose codebase, rating repository quality, inspecting recomposition/state issues, or running a Compose audit.
Gold-standard code review for SAP CC Go repositories against the project's lead review standards. Dispatches 10 domain-specialist agents in parallel — each loads domain-specific references and scans ALL packages for violations in their assigned domain. Produces a prioritized report with REJECTED/CORRECT code examples. Optional --fix mode applies corrections on a worktree branch. This is the definitive "would this code pass lead review?" assessment.
Objective task quality evaluation framework using quantitative KPIs. KPIs are automatically calculated by a hook when task files are modified and saved to TASK-XXX--kpi.json. Use when: reading KPI data for task evaluation, understanding quality metrics, deciding whether to iterate or approve based on data.
Review a diff, PR, branch, or path across ten orthogonal dimensions (correctness, security, encapsulation, spec, complexity, deslop, assertions, NIH, efficiency, telemetry) and emit a severity-grouped findings report. Use when the user wants a code review — phrases like "review this", "/age", "is this safe to merge", "find bugs", "spot security issues", "check for slop", "review my PR", "what's wrong with this code". Use even when the user only asks for one dimension — the report scopes itself. Do NOT use for applying fixes (route to /cure) or test hardening (route to /press).
Code review of current git changes, compare to related plan if exists, identify bad engineering, over-engineering, or suboptimal solutions. Use when user asks to review changes, check git diff, validate implementation quality, or assess code changes.
Use this skill when the user asks for a review, audit, evaluation or analysis of a codebase, to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, or code quality concerns.
Comprehensive quality auditing and evaluation of tools, frameworks, and systems against industry best practices with detailed scoring across 12 critical dimensions
Track, categorize, and prioritize technical debt when the user asks to manage tech debt, create a tech debt register, assess code quality, or plan refactoring work
Execute a comprehensive NestJS Project Health Audit. Analyzes tech stack, architecture, API design, data layer, testing, code quality, CI/CD, and documentation. Produces a Google Docs-ready report with section scores and weighted overall score. Use when the user asks to audit a NestJS project, run a health check, evaluate backend quality, or assess technical debt. Triggers on: 'nestjs audit', 'health audit', 'backend audit', 'nestjs health', 'node audit', 'api audit', 'project quality check'.
Perform automated code reviews on GitLab merge requests. Analyzes code for style, bugs, security, performance, and error handling issues. Generates HTML report for easy reading.