Loading...
Loading...
Found 68 Skills
Decision Coaching for Vue Component/Composable Refactoring — Users paste a piece of code or point to an SFC, and the skill first performs a diagnosis ("Fat Trunk" / "UI & IO Entanglement" / "Reactivity & Business Logic Entanglement"), then selects one from three recipes, and provides a specific sequence of extraction steps (which variable to move first, what errors the compiler will throw, how to fix them one by one, when rollback is possible). The entire process ensures behavioral equivalence through compiler green lights + step-by-step rollback, without relying on test safeguards. Trigger scenarios: Users say "This Vue component is too fat / I want to extract the logic / Split this SFC / This composable is too messy / Extract a composable / Split into humble / Pure functionalize", or point to an obviously overlong .vue / composable file and request "Refactor / Optimize / Split". Only handles Vue (Vue 2 Options, Vue 2/3 `<script setup>`, composable, pinia store). Does not handle: Adding new features (follow feature process), fixing bugs (follow issue process), cross-module architecture restructuring, backend code.
Applies software engineering best practices, design principles, and avoids common anti-patterns. Use when designing systems, reviewing code quality, refactoring legacy code, making architectural decisions, or improving maintainability.
Resolve all TODO comments using parallel processing
Analyzes coupling between modules using the three-dimensional model (strength, distance, volatility) from "Balancing Coupling in Software Design". Use when asking "are these modules too coupled?", "show me dependencies", "analyze integration quality", "which modules should I decouple?", "coupling report", or evaluating architectural health. Do NOT use for domain boundary analysis (use domain-analysis) or component sizing (use component-identification-sizing).
Use gitcrawl to search duplicate OpenClaw PRs/issues, group related work in prtags, and sync duplicate state to GitHub.
Activate when creating new modules, refactoring class hierarchies, introducing design patterns, or making changes spanning 3+ files in the APM CLI codebase.
Detect code smells including long methods, large classes, duplicated code, and deep nesting. Use when identifying code quality issues or planning refactoring.
Review code after implementation work to identify design flaws, abstraction issues, or maintenance risks that only became clear once real code was written. Use whenever the user asks whether a recent change exposed architectural problems, whether an abstraction is fighting the implementation, or whether a refactor is justified. Be conservative and avoid suggesting refactors without concrete evidence of recurring cost or complexity.
Simplify existing code without changing behavior. Focus on local complexity reduction such as flattening nesting, extracting readable helpers, removing dead code, consolidating obvious duplication, and improving names. Use when the user explicitly asks to simplify, clean up, or reduce complexity in existing code.
Fix a known bug in the Rock RMS codebase. Guides Claude through root cause analysis, minimal correct fix, and a release-note commit message. Use when the user says "fix this bug", "bugfix", "this is broken", "debug this", describes a bug with file paths or issue numbers, or pastes an error/stack trace with intent to fix. Also use when a bug is found by another skill (e.g. /review-conversion, /check) and the user wants it fixed. Do NOT use for: finding bugs (use /check or /review-conversion), adding features, or refactoring.
Sweep the current branch for leftovers of an abandoned design after a significant mid-work decision change, and rewrite the affected code, comments, tests, and docs so the result reads as if it had been designed this way from the beginning. Use when the user says "design cleanup", "clean up the old approach", "erase the journey", says a design decision changed and asks to clean up after it, or after a pivot in approach mid-branch. This is a rewrite pass over the code touched by the decision only — not a general refactoring or bug-hunting pass.
[Fix & Debug] ⚡⚡ Fix a GitHub issue with systematic debugging