Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,907 Skills
Create a new Harbor task for evaluating agents. Use when the user wants to scaffold, build, or design a new task, benchmark problem, or eval. Guides through instruction writing, environment setup, verifier design (pytest vs Reward Kit vs custom), and solution scripting.
Use when building, migrating, or debugging Agent Evals on Inngest: scoring AI agent or workflow outcomes, deferred scorers, sessions, traces, step experiments, experiment variant attribution, Insights queries, or production eval loops for prompts, models, tools, providers, and agent behavior. Covers TypeScript SDK v4 scoring beta APIs, `scoreMiddleware`, `step.score`, `inngest.score`, `createScorer`, `defer`, `group.experiment`, `experimentRef`, `meta.sessions`, and when to use durable workflow primitives for outcome-based evaluation.
Launch a sub-agent judge to evaluate results produced in the current conversation
Evaluate solutions through multi-round debate between independent judges until consensus
Generate and critically evaluate grounded ideas about a topic. Use when asking what to improve, requesting idea generation, exploring surprising directions, or wanting the AI to proactively suggest strong options before brainstorming one in depth. Triggers on phrases like 'what should I improve', 'give me ideas', 'ideate on X', 'surprise me', 'what would you change', or any request for AI-generated suggestions rather than refining the user's own idea.
Create, run, diagnose, and iteratively improve Agent Skill evaluations (evals) with the skill-up CLI / 使用 skill-up CLI 创建、运行、诊断并持续改进 Agent Skill 评测. Use when the user asks to evaluate, test, regress, verify, fix, improve, iterate, or evolve a Skill; add or strengthen eval cases; write eval.yaml/case.yaml; run skill-up run/validate/list-cases/report/import/init; or migrate from Anthropic evals.json. Handles Skill discovery, eval scaffolding, judge authoring, validation, runs, reports, and evidence-based repair loops.
Build the evaluation harness that gates every fine-tuning run — golden sets, per-failure-mode graders, judge calibration, and base-model baselines. Use when starting a fine-tuning effort, when converting traces into an eval set, or when calibrating a judge against human labels.
Measures the task accuracy of text models served by MAX using standard benchmarks such as GSM8K, MMLU, HellaSwag, ARC, AIME, GPQA, TruthfulQA, WinoGrande, and BABILong. Use when benchmarking a served model, comparing it with model-card or reference scores, verifying that a new MAX model produces correct answers, or running repeatable dataset evaluations against a MAX OpenAI-compatible endpoint.
Build RAG / unstructured-document evaluation datasets and demo documents (e.g. for Knowledge Assistant) on Databricks: generate synthetic PDFs locally, upload to Unity Catalog volumes, and pair each document with test questions for retrieval evaluation.
Consult the accepted standard and strongest supported exemplars for a decision, plan, design, completed artifact, or diff, then return a source-grounded recommendation or evaluation.
FiveM resource structure, fxmanifest, client/server scripting, events. Use when creating or editing FiveM resources or Lua scripts, or when the user asks how FiveM works.
Stateful single-mission improvement loop with strict evaluator contract, markdown decision logs, and max-runtime stop behavior