Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,194 Skills
Detect Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) violations using multi-dimensional analysis. Use when reviewing code for "SRP", "single responsibility", "god class", "doing too much", "too many dependencies", before commits, during refactoring, or as quality gate. Analyzes Python, JavaScript, TypeScript files with AST-based detection, metrics (TCC, ATFD, WMC), and project-specific patterns. Provides actionable fix guidance with refactoring estimates.
Review React/TypeScript code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md workflow compliance. Enforces TypeScript strict mode, GPU-accelerated animations, WCAG AA accessibility, bundle size limits, and surgical simplicity. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.
Add educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.
Review an existing game codebase for architecture, performance, and best practices
Use when reviewing a plan before implementation begins. Not for autonomous plan analysis — use plan-review agent instead. Challenges scope, walks through architecture/quality/tests/performance interactively with mandatory user checkpoints and opinionated recommendations.
When writing or reviewing code to eliminate duplicated knowledge and business logic. Use when the user says "this is duplicated," "we have this in two places," "single source of truth," "DRY this up," or "shotgun surgery." For premature abstraction concerns, see yagni.
When writing or reviewing code to prevent over-engineering and speculative features. Use when the user says "is this over-engineered," "do we need this," "should I add," "future-proof," or "just in case." For simplicity concerns, see kiss. For abstraction design, see solid.
Scans code against 17 named design smells and produces a structured diagnostic report. Use when reviewing a PR for design quality, evaluating unfamiliar code against a comprehensive checklist or when the user asks for a red flags scan. Not for diagnosing why code feels complex (use complexity-recognition) or evaluating whether a PR maintains design trajectory (use code-evolution).
Run after making Docyrus API changes to catch bugs, performance issues, and code quality problems. Use when implementing or modifying code that uses Docyrus collection hooks (.list, .get, .create, .update, .delete), direct RestApiClient calls, query payloads with filters/calculations/formulas/childQueries/pivots, or TanStack Query integration with Docyrus data sources. Triggers on tasks involving Docyrus API logic, data fetching, mutations, or query payload construction.
Expert code review of current git changes with a senior engineer lens. Detects SOLID violations, security risks, and proposes actionable improvements.
Multi-agent quality improvement review with constructive feedback. Provides suggestions for best practices, code quality, alternatives, and performance optimization.
Comprehensive Python expertise covering language fundamentals, idiomatic patterns, software design principles, and production best practices. Use when writing, reviewing, debugging, or refactoring Python code. Triggers: Python, .py files, pip, uv, pytest, dataclasses, asyncio, type hints, or any Python library.