Loading...
Loading...
Found 74 Skills
Expertise in Senior Principal Engineering refactoring. Use when you need to eliminate technical debt, remove "AI Slop," simplify complex logic, and ensure DRY code.
Performs comprehensive codebase analysis covering architecture, code quality, security, performance, testing, and maintainability. Use when user wants to audit code quality, identify technical debt, find security issues, assess test coverage, or get a codebase health check.
Translates engineering metrics (DORA, error rates, technical debt) into business KPIs and financial impact. Helps justify technical investments to stakeholders.
This skill should be used when analyzing technical debt in a codebase, documenting code quality issues, creating technical debt registers, or assessing code maintainability. Use this for identifying code smells, architectural issues, dependency problems, missing documentation, security vulnerabilities, and creating comprehensive technical debt documentation.
Registro, priorización y planificación de deuda técnica: taxonomía, puntuación, informe, integración con sprint.
Audit rapidly generated or AI-produced code for structural flaws, fragility, and production risks.
Systematically evaluate architecture decisions, document trade-offs, and select appropriate patterns. This skill should be used when the user asks about 'architecture decision', 'ADR', 'design pattern selection', 'technology choice', or needs to evaluate architectural trade-offs. Keywords: architecture, ADR, patterns, trade-offs, technical debt, quality attributes, decision record.
Executes large-scale architectural refactoring and technical debt reduction across the entire codebase. Ensures consistency with modern design patterns.
Playbook iterativo para llevar proyectos Node y TypeScript (NestJS + React en monorepo) a cumplir Quality Gates de SonarQube sin romper build ni pipelines. Usar cuando se necesite subir cobertura priorizando New Code, eliminar issues nuevos (Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Code Smells), revisar Security Hotspots y controlar duplicacion y deuda tecnica.
Code quality gatekeeper and auditor. Enforces strict quality gates, resolves the AI verification gap, and evaluates codebases across 12 critical dimensions with evidence-based scoring. Use when auditing code quality, reviewing AI-generated code, scoring codebases against industry standards, or enforcing pre-commit quality gates. Use for quality audit, code review, codebase evaluation, security assessment, technical debt analysis.
Systematic detection and prioritization of neglected code quality issues: stale TODOs, unused imports, deprecated functions, high complexity, dead code. Use when user requests "code cleanup", "find TODOs", "technical debt scan", or "quality of life fixes". Do NOT use for bug fixing (use systematic-debugging), feature work (use test-driven-development), or formatting-only (use code-linting).
Reviews codebases, architectures, PRs, and technical plans for vanity engineering — code and systems built for the developer's ego, resume, or intellectual pleasure rather than delivering user or business value. Triggers on: "review this code", "is this over-engineered", "code review", "architecture review", "complexity audit", "vanity check", "is this necessary", "simplify this", "tech debt review", or any request to evaluate whether code or architecture is justified by actual requirements. Also trigger when the user shares a codebase and asks for feedback, when discussing framework/library choices, when reviewing PRs, or when someone is debating whether to refactor or rebuild. Nudge activation when you detect patterns of unnecessary abstraction, premature optimization, or resume-driven technology choices in code the user shares — even if they haven't asked for a vanity review.