Loading...
Loading...
Found 145 Skills
Proactively analyze user requests at the start of conversations to determine task type, assess prompt quality, and intelligently recommend which skills to activate. Should activate for ALL user requests to ensure optimal workflow. Evaluates clarity, specificity, and completeness to suggest prompt-optimizer when needed. Identifies UI design tasks for ui-analyzer and component requests for react-component-generator. Acts as intelligent skill coordinator.
PluginEval quality methodology — dimensions, rubrics, statistical methods, and scoring formulas. Use this skill when understanding how plugin quality is measured, when interpreting a low score on a specific dimension, when deciding how to improve a skill's triggering accuracy or orchestration fitness, when calibrating scoring thresholds for your marketplace, or when explaining quality badges to external partners like Neon.
Checkpoint - Pre-publish review with multi-layer deep analysis. Triggers: Preparing to publish an npm package, requiring pre-release review, or checking code change quality. Review Layers: - Per-Change: In-depth analysis of each change group (up to 10 Agents) - Holistic: Parallel review by 5 roles (Architecture/Development/Testing/Security/Documentation) - Synthesis: 1 Agent summarizes review results Commands: - /把关 - Start pre-publish review - /把关 check - Check unpublished changes - /把关 version - Recommend version upgrade - /把关 report - Generate review report - /review - English command Capabilities: Unpublished change detection, in-depth per-change analysis, multi-role review, version recommendation, release risk assessment.
Deep diagnostic of Claude/SDD configuration. Read-only. Produces audit-report.md consumed by /project-fix. Trigger: /project-audit, audit project, review claude config, project health check.
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.
Technical solution evaluation and code review in the style of Linus Torvalds. Only use this when the user explicitly requests a Linus-style review or explicitly asks for a rigorous evaluation of code changes/technical solutions (e.g., "review changes/code", "evaluate if the solution is appropriate", "check submission standards", "linus-tech-review").
验证研究报告中所有声明的引用准确性、来源质量和格式规范性。确保每个事实性声明都有可验证的来源，并提供来源质量评级。当最终确定研究报告、审查他人研究、发布或分享研究之前使用此技能。
Test suite audit coordinator (L2). Delegates to 5 workers (Business Logic, E2E, Value, Coverage, Isolation). Aggregates results, creates Linear task in Epic 0.
Is this token held by quality wallets or retail noise? SM holder ratio, flow breakdown by label, and recent buyer quality.
Meta-prompting framework for critiquing responses, analyzing solution trajectories, and evaluating AI-generated content quality
Use when the user wants to review a pull request, understand what a PR changes, assess risk of merging, or check for missing test coverage. Examples: "Review this PR", "What does PR #42 change?", "Is this PR safe to merge?"
Comprehensive Go backend code review with optional parallel agents