Loading...
Loading...
Found 72 Skills
Review git diffs, staged changes, and GitHub PRs. Change-focused analysis across seven pillars (Security, Performance, Architecture, Error Handling, Testing, Maintainability, Paranoia) with numeric scoring 1-10. Supports GitHub PR review, staged changes, and arbitrary diffs. Use when: reviewing a PR, reviewing staged changes, reviewing a diff, pre-commit review. Triggers: review PR, review my changes, review the diff, review staged, review-pr, check my changes.
Review local git changes from 8 expert perspectives using multi-agent team orchestration. Produces a consolidated report with Critical/Important/Nice-to-have severity levels. Lightweight pre-commit or pre-push quality gate — no PR or branch push required. Use when the user asks to review local changes, check changes before committing, get a team review of working tree changes, or run a pre-commit review. Trigger phrases include "review local", "review my changes", "review local changes", "pre-commit review", "review before commit", "review before push", "team review my changes", "check my changes", "review working tree", "local code review", "review diff", "review my diff".
Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity, and standards issues, then optionally apply safe Codex-driven fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".
A skill for reviewing a specific diff and showing the findings as comments inside difit (the diff viewer). Use it to review branch diffs, commit diffs, or GitHub PRs, then preload findings or code explanations into difit with `--comment` before launching it for the user.
Find branch coverage gaps in changed code and fix them by writing missing tests. Two analysis layers: Source ↔ Test (logic branches vs test cases) and Spec ↔ Test (requirement scenarios vs test cases, when a spec file is provided). Use when verifying test completeness after implementing a feature or fixing a bug, when auditing whether tests match a spec, or when suspecting untested branches.
[Review & Quality] ⚡⚡⚡ Two-pass code review for task completion
Supports commands: [commit|commit_a commit_b] [--verify] [--apply] [--commit] Interactive git diff review skill. Parses git diff output into individual hunks, presents each hunk to the user with analysis for accept/reject decisions, verifies complete coverage, and generates a Markdown review report.
Runs .continue/agents checks locally against the current diff, simulating the GitHub PR checks experience. Use when the user says /check to review their changes before pushing.
Interactive Code Review: Inspect architecture, code quality, testing, and performance section by section. Can review git diff, specified files, or entire PRs. Trigger words: /code-review, review code, code review, code review
프로젝트 컨텍스트를 파악한 뒤 전문가 관점으로 코드 리뷰하고, 사용자 승인 후 Agent Team SPAWN으로 병렬 개선 작업을 수행합니다. 트리거: 코드리뷰, 코드 리뷰, code review, 리뷰해줘, 리팩토링, 코드검토, PR 리뷰, 변경사항 검토.
Generate and create pull request descriptions automatically using GitHub CLI. Use when the user asks to create a PR, generate a PR description, make a pull request, or submit changes for review. Analyzes git diff and commit history to create comprehensive, meaningful PR descriptions that explain what changed, why it matters, and how to test it.
Detects optimal commit type from git changes. Use when analyzing commits, determining commit type, or before committing.