Loading...
Loading...
Found 56 Skills
Verify a specific claim by searching for evidence across web and academic sources. Use when the user asks to verify, fact-check, or confirm a statement.
Side role: find and correct bad signals, earn leaderboard points per Publisher-approved correction (max 3/day)
Detects fabricated content, false citations, and unverifiable claims in agent outputs. Uses source verification and consistency checking. Activate on 'detect hallucination', 'fact check', 'verify claims', 'check accuracy', 'find fabrications'. NOT for validation (use dag-output-validator) or confidence scoring (use dag-confidence-scorer).
Research topics, verify facts, check historical accuracy, and validate technical details. Use when writing non-fiction, historical fiction, or any content requiring factual accuracy.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
A validation framework that ensures Claude's responses are current, accurate, complete, and clear. Use this skill whenever the user asks a factual or research question, requests analysis or recommendations (e.g., "What's the best framework for X?", "Compare options for Y"), or any prompt where recency and accuracy matter. Also trigger when the user explicitly asks for validated, verified, or fact-checked answers. This skill should activate broadly — if the answer depends on facts that could have changed in the last few months, use it. Even questions that seem straightforward ("Is X still the recommended approach?") benefit from this skill's validation pipeline. Do NOT trigger for purely creative writing, casual chat, or tasks that are entirely opinion-based with no factual claims.
Verify claims in generated output against sources. Use as a separate pass AFTER content generation to catch hallucinations. Critical constraint - cannot be reliably combined with generation in a single pass.
Use when delegating research tasks requiring verified information from multiple authoritative sources - crawls and fact-checks beyond surface-level findings, providing evidence of verification process with confidence levels for each claim
Analyze arguments, detect biases, evaluate claims, and improve reasoning. Use when asked to fact-check, identify logical fallacies, evaluate arguments, analyze predictions, find root causes, or think adversarially about plans. Triggers include "evaluate this argument", "logical fallacies", "fact check", "analyze the claims", "identify biases", "devil's advocate", "red team this", "root cause".
Evaluate source credibility using primary/secondary classification, internal/external criticism, triangulation, and misinformation detection. Use this skill when the user needs to assess whether information is trustworthy, evaluate research sources, fact-check claims, or detect misinformation — even if they say 'can I trust this source', 'is this real', 'how reliable is this data', or 'fact-check this for me'.
News Briefing + Verification Workflow. This workflow applies when users request news, headlines, daily briefings, "today's news", "latest updates", breaking news, or specific current figures/events that demand reliable sources and timestamps. Source links and local publication time are mandatory; NEVER fabricate any content.
Research topics with web search. Use when: researching a topic or concept, finding current information, answering factual questions, comparing options or technologies. Triggers: research [topic], find out about, what are the best practices for, research the latest on.