Loading...
Loading...
Found 51 Skills
Execute a micro-level Flutter code quality audit. Validates code against live GitHub standards for testing, architecture, and code implementation. Produces a detailed violations report with prioritized action plan. Use when the user asks to check Flutter code quality, validate best practices, or review code standards compliance. Triggers on: 'flutter best practices', 'code quality', 'code review', 'flutter standards', 'architecture compliance', 'testing quality'.
Analiza cambios staged en git para detectar bugs, vulnerabilidades de seguridad, malas prácticas, y genera descripciones detalladas de commits con mensaje en formato Conventional Commits. Usa este skill siempre que el usuario quiera revisar cambios antes de commitear o pushear, analizar un diff staged, detectar bugs o malas prácticas en código que está por commitear, generar un mensaje o descripción de commit, o hacer code review previo al commit. Se activa con frases como "revisá mis cambios staged", "analiza mi commit", "qué bugs tiene lo que cambié", "generame el mensaje de commit", "review antes de push", "detecta errores en mis cambios", "haceme un análisis antes de commitear", o "necesito una descripción para mi commit". NO usar para: code review de archivos sueltos sin contexto de commit, configurar linters, escribir tests, debugging de producción, o crear código nuevo. Este skill es específicamente para el momento previo al commit.
Generates dead code detection configurations for loom plan verification. Provides language-specific commands, fail patterns, and ignore patterns for Rust, TypeScript, Python, Go, and JavaScript. Use when adding code quality checks to acceptance criteria or truths fields in loom plans. Dead code detection catches incomplete wiring by identifying code that exists but is never called.
Review Vendure entities for missing VendureEntity inheritance, improper decorators, missing migrations, index violations, and TypeORM anti-patterns. Use when reviewing entity PRs or auditing data models.
Review Prisma code for common violations, security issues, and performance anti-patterns found in AI coding agent stress testing. Use when reviewing Prisma Client usage, database operations, or performing code reviews on projects using Prisma ORM.
Use this skill when posting the final summary comment after all inline comments are posted. Apply as the LAST step of code review after all findings are classified and inline comments are complete. Detects context (GitHub sticky comment, new comment, or local file) and routes output accordingly.
[Testing] Autonomous subagent variant of code-review. Use when reviewing code changes, pull requests, or performing refactoring analysis with focus on patterns, security, and performance.
Scans code against 17 named design smells and produces a structured diagnostic report. Use when reviewing a PR for design quality, evaluating unfamiliar code against a comprehensive checklist or when the user asks for a red flags scan. Not for diagnosing why code feels complex (use complexity-recognition) or evaluating whether a PR maintains design trajectory (use code-evolution).
Stage all changes, commit, and push. Use when user asks to "ship", "commit and push", "add all and push", or requests staging all changes, committing, and pushing.
Scope-aware GitHub PR review with user-friendly tone and trust tier validation
Systematic OSS release preparation checklist. Use when preparing a repository for open-source publishing, making a project public, or ensuring a repo meets OSS standards. Triggers: "prepare for OSS", "ready to publish", "make this public", "OSS checklist", "scan repo for publish", "open source this", "/oss-release-prep"
Review RTK Rust code for idiomatic simplification. Detects over-engineering, unnecessary allocations, verbose patterns. Applies Rust idioms without changing behavior.