Loading...
Loading...
Found 72 Skills
Respond to PR review comments with critical evaluation. Use when addressing code review feedback, responding to bot review comments (Gemini Code Assist, CodeRabbit, etc.), or handling PR suggestions. Fetches comments, evaluates each against project context, applies valid fixes, declines invalid suggestions with reasoning, and posts responses.
Perform systematic self-review of code changes before commits using structured checklist. Validates architecture boundaries, code quality, test coverage, documentation, and project-specific anti-patterns. Use before committing, creating PRs, or when user says "review my changes", "self-review", "check my code". Adapts to Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Rust projects.
Run Python quality checks with ruff, pytest, mypy, and bandit in deterministic order. Use WHEN user requests "quality gate", "lint", "verify code quality", "check python", or "pre-commit check". Use for pre-merge validation, CI/CD gating, or comprehensive code quality reports. Do NOT use for single-tool runs (run tool directly), debugging runtime bugs (use systematic-debugging), refactoring (use systematic-refactoring), or architecture review.
Adopt the Three Provinces and Six Ministries style code review, output structured review conclusions in five stages: Zhongshu Sheng, Shangshu Sheng, Six Ministries, Menxia Sheng, and Jinyiwei
Grill the diff. Specialists evaluate every finding internally — only high-value findings reach the user for discussion until reaching shared understanding.
Implements SDD plan tasks following specs and design, marking progress in tasks.md as it goes. Trigger: /sdd-apply <change-name>, implement change, apply SDD tasks, write code for change.
Follow this sub-process when fixing bugs—turn the verbal description of "discovered a problem" into a closed loop of verification and repair, leaving three documents in the middle: issue report, root cause analysis, and repair record. This process adds a buffer between "seeing the problem" and "starting to modify code", avoiding several common pitfalls: the problem description in your mind disappears after modification, fixing only the surface without analyzing the root cause, uncontrollable expansion of repair scope that cannot be traced, and not knowing if the fix is correct without verification after modification. This skill only acts as a router, deciding which of report / analyze / fix to proceed with based on existing outputs. For simple problems that can be identified at a glance, a fast track will be taken, skipping the two middle steps and only keeping the fix-note.
Open source contribution best practices. Creating quality pull requests, writing good issues, following project conventions, and collaborating effectively with maintainers.
Periodic repository health check — dependencies, git, CI/CD, code quality, docs, security. Use when: onboarding to a repo, weekly maintenance, after big refactors, before audits, "is this repo in good shape?". Triggers: "repo hygiene", "health check", "repo health", "clean up repo", "maintenance check", "audit repo", "repo audit".
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
Review current uncommitted git changes with full file context and produce a structured report with severity levels, actionable fixes, and an approval verdict.
Use this skill when the user asks to review their local git changes, staged or unstaged diffs, or wants a code review before committing. Triggers on "review my changes", "review staged", "review my diff", "check my code", "code review local changes", "review unstaged", "review before commit".