Loading...
Loading...
Found 53 Skills
Validate Architecture Decision Records (ADR) against Layer 5 schema standards
Collaborative design exploration for new features and architecture decisions. Triggers: 'brainstorm', 'ideate', 'explore options', or /ideate. Presents 2-3 approaches with trade-offs, documents chosen approach. Do NOT use for implementation planning or code review. Requires no existing design document — use /plan if one exists.
Crear o actualizar Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) en docs/adr/. Activar siempre que el usuario quiera documentar, registrar, actualizar o cambiar el estado de una decisión arquitectónica — incluso si no usa la palabra "ADR". Frases que activan este skill: "registrar decisión", "documentar por qué usamos X", "dejar constancia de esta elección técnica", "decision record", "cambiar ADR a Accepted", "marcar como Superseded", "crear ADR", "actualizar ADR", "nuevo ADR", "ADR-XXX". Usar también cuando el usuario describa una tensión arquitectónica que deba quedar documentada.
Diagnose design problems and guide architecture decisions for solo developers
Technical leadership advisor for CTOs on architecture decisions, engineering strategy, team scaling, technical debt management, and technology evaluation.
A decision-support framework that evaluates systems, architectures, and strategies through the entropy (decay) vs negentropy (growth) lens, while surfacing tacit knowledge gaps. Use this skill whenever the user is making architecture decisions, evaluating system designs, reviewing technical approaches, choosing between options, auditing existing systems, or planning strategies. Also trigger when the user explicitly asks to "apply the negentropy lens", mentions "entropy", "negentropy", "tacit knowledge", "knowledge engine", or "flip the switch". Nudge activation when you detect the user is at a decision point — even if they haven't asked for this lens — by briefly noting the entropic/negentropic dimension before proceeding.
Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.
Read back adr-patterns + adr-edges namespaces, surface dangling refs / supersede cycles / status mismatches; exit 1 on cycles
Expert technical advisor with deep reasoning for architecture decisions, code analysis, and engineering guidance. Masters complex tradeoffs, system design, security architecture, performance optimization, and engineering best practices. Use when making critical architecture decisions, after implementing significant work, when debugging complex issues, encountering unfamiliar patterns, facing security/performance concerns, or evaluating multi-system tradeoffs. Provides comprehensive analysis with clear recommendations and rationale.
Inspeccionar un proyecto existente para descubrir decisiones arquitectónicas implícitas y proponer ADRs candidatos. Usar cuando el usuario quiera auditar un repositorio en busca de decisiones no documentadas, pida "descubrir ADRs", "qué decisiones arquitectónicas tiene este proyecto", "busca ADRs en el repo", "analiza la arquitectura del proyecto" o cualquier variante que implique explorar el código/estructura para inferir decisiones relevantes que merezcan un ADR. Activar también cuando el usuario llegue a un proyecto nuevo y quiera entender qué decisiones ya se tomaron, aunque no mencione explícitamente "ADR".
Produces the technical design with architecture decisions, data flow, and a file change plan. Trigger: /sdd-design <change-name>, technical design, change architecture, how to implement.
Document finalized technology selections, architecture decisions, long-term constraints, and coding conventions in the project into searchable permanent documents. No one will remember why X was chosen six months later, but with decision documents, at least the background can be understood before making changes next time. Four types: tech-stack (which tools/libraries/frameworks to use), architecture (how the system is organized), constraint (what is not allowed), convention (what is uniformly done). Trigger scenarios: Proactively push when important choices are made after feature-design or issue-analyze, or when the user says "record decision", "archive technology selection", "ADR", "record this constraint", "write down the convention". Only archive finalized decisions; do not archive under-discussion solutions.