Loading...
Loading...
Found 422 Skills
Reviews finished and in-progress digital products to assess adherence to design specifications and discover potential issues. Use when user says "design review", "design QA", "QA review", "check implementation", "visual bugs", "compare to design", "match the specs", "review the build", "before launch", "pre-launch review", "implementation review", "verify design", "design validation", "spacing issues", "visual discrepancies", "accessibility review", "WCAG compliance", or "responsive testing". Validates implementation against design intent, identifies visual and interaction discrepancies, and provides actionable feedback. Do NOT use when still designing concepts (use design-concepts), need to understand users (use design-research), or nothing has been built yet.
This skill should be used when a team wants to create or refine the QA standards document — for example "create the QA steering doc", "document our test strategy", "write the QA standards", "document our definition of done", "set up the QA guidelines", or "update the QA doc". Generates docs/steering/QA.md as a living document capturing test strategy, coverage thresholds, test patterns, definition of done, and environments. Generated once and refined — not regenerated from scratch.
Use when stories, specs, BRDs, APIs, workflows, or equivalent delivery artifacts exist and you need to review them for testability, missing business rules, unclear behavior, scope ambiguity, and QA blocking gaps before generating tests. Supports `--quick-flow` for fast assumption-driven execution and `--full-flow` for question-driven verified execution. Explicit full or end-to-end spec refinement requests continue through the existing 18-stage refinement cascade.
Expert in quality assurance and testing. Responsible for bug detection, edge case validation, test planning, and automated test creation to ensure software reliability.
Use before launching sequences to validate content, data, compliance, and monitoring.
Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only.
Generate end to end automated tests for existing features. Use when the user says "create qa automated tests for [feature]"
Analyze, prioritize, and document test cases in TMS (Jira/Xray) -- the bridge between manual QA and test automation. Use when creating Test/ATP/ATR artifacts, calculating ROI to choose which tests to automate, maintaining US-ATP-ATR-TC traceability, or repairing broken TMS links. Supports four scopes: module-driven (exhaustive module exploration), ticket-driven (QA-approved user story), bug-driven (regression TC for a closed bug), and ad-hoc/exploratory. Produces three outcomes per TC: Candidate (feeds test-automation), Manual (terminal), Deferred (terminal). Triggers on: document tests, create test cases in Jira/Xray, prioritize for automation, ROI analysis, which tests to automate, Candidate vs Manual, link ATP to ATR, fix TMS traceability, stage 4, turn this bug into a regression test. Do NOT use for writing test code (test-automation) or running suites (regression-testing).
This skill should be used when the user asks to "test this website", "run exploratory testing", "check for accessibility issues", "verify the login flow works", "find bugs on this page", or requests automated QA testing. Triggers on web application testing scenarios including smoke tests, accessibility audits, e-commerce flows, and user flow validation using ScoutQA CLI. IMPORTANT: Use this skill proactively after implementing web application features to verify they work correctly - don't wait for the user to ask for testing.
Design risk-based test strategies and validate release readiness across functional and non-functional dimensions.
Generates clear, actionable verification guides for QA testing of Positron bug fixes and features
Adversarial Quarto vs Beamer QA. Critic finds issues, fixer applies fixes, loops until APPROVED (max 5 rounds).