Loading...
Loading...
Found 73 Skills
Use when running meetings, workshops, brainstorms, design sprints, retrospectives, or team decision-making sessions. Apply when need structured group discussion, managing diverse stakeholder input, ensuring equal participation, handling conflict or groupthink, or when user mentions facilitation, workshop design, meeting patterns, session planning, or running effective collaborative sessions.
Manage change control for validated computerized systems. Covers change request triage (emergency, standard, minor), impact assessment on validated state, revalidation scope determination, approval workflows, implementation tracking, and post-change verification. Use when a validated system requires a software upgrade, patch, or configuration change; when infrastructure changes affect validated systems; when a CAPA requires system modification; or when emergency changes need expedited approval and retrospective documentation.
Apply Edward de Bono's Six Thinking Hats methodology to software testing for comprehensive quality analysis. Use when designing test strategies, conducting test retrospectives, analyzing test failures, evaluating testing approaches, or facilitating testing discussions. Each hat provides a distinct testing perspective: facts (White), risks (Black), benefits (Yellow), creativity (Green), emotions (Red), and process (Blue).
Trigger: Called when a task is completed, enters phase acceptance, receives critical feedback, or repeated similar errors require systematic correction; common signals include review, audit, retrospective, quality check, error correction and retrospective. Trigger after delivery or at a review checkpoint when quality must be examined honestly and errors must be corrected without defensiveness. Use this skill for structured self-review, feedback processing, and continuous correction.
Run blameless post-mortems & retrospectives and produce a Post-mortems & Retrospectives Pack (brief + agenda, facts/timeline, contributing factors + root causes, decisions + action tracker, kill criteria, learning dissemination plan). Use for postmortem, post-mortem, retrospective, retro, after action review, lessons learned. Category: Leadership.
Post-session retrospective: audits efficiency, proposes skill/memory/CLAUDE.md updates, and generates coaching feedback
Facilitates and documents a team retrospective capturing what went well, what to improve, and action items. Use at the end of sprints, projects, or milestones to reflect and improve team practices.
Optional skill. Reconstruct a human-review-preparation file from an existing pull request, merge request, branch diff, or commit range in a repository the user trusts. Use when the user wants retrospective understanding of already-implemented changes, AI-side assessment and recommendations, and an optional provider-specific sharing variant written to a local file when needed.
Use this tool when you are completing project work and need to extract reusable knowledge from project notes. It is triggered by commands such as "organize assets", "refine", during project retrospectives, or in high-context debugging sessions that reveal valuable patterns. Trigger commands: /asset-refine, /asset-extract
Post-pipeline retrospective — parse logs, score process quality, find waste patterns, suggest skill/script patches. Use after pipeline completes or when user says "retro", "evaluate pipeline", "what went wrong", "pipeline review", "check pipeline logs".
(Industry standard: Loop Agent / Single Agent) Primary Use Case: Self-contained research, content generation, and exploration where no inner delegation is required. Self-directed research and knowledge capture loop. Use when: starting a session (Orientation), performing research (Synthesis), or closing a session (Seal, Persist, Retrospective). Ensures knowledge survives across isolated agent sessions.
Structured session analysis and project instruction refinement using a five-type intervention taxonomy (Correction, Repetition, Role Redirect, Frustration Escalation, Workaround) with severity scoring to categorize process gaps. Refines project instructions (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, .team/coordinator-instructions.md) with structural (not advisory) language, maintains WORKING_STATE.md for crash recovery (read-first-after-any- interruption protocol), and implements a self-reminder protocol (re-read constraints every 5-10 messages to prevent role drift). Includes advisory- to-structural promotion pattern for recurring gaps. Activate after milestones, repeated user corrections, session restarts, crash recovery, every 5 completed tasks, or on user request. Triggers on: "reflect on this session", "why do I keep correcting you", "update project instructions", "update working state", "session retrospective", "crash recovery", "context compaction", "role drift", "I keep telling you the same thing", "analyze my corrections". Also relevant when the agent notices repeated corrections, needs to resume after compaction, or wants to prevent known failure modes from recurring.