Loading...
Loading...
Found 72 Skills
Process external code review feedback with technical rigor. Use when receiving feedback from another LLM, human reviewer, or CI tool. Verifies claims before implementing, tracks disposition.
Manage repositories, check pipelines, review PRs, and collaborate on Bitbucket
Reviews pull requests and code changes for quality, security, and best practices. Use when user asks for code review, PR review, or mentions reviewing changes.
Guides Android code reviews with type-specific checklists and MVVM/Compose pattern validation. Use when reviewing Android PRs, pull requests, diffs, or local changes involving Kotlin, ViewModel, Composable, Repository, or Gradle files. Triggered by "review PR", "review changes", "check this code", "Android review", or code review requests mentioning bitwarden/android. Loads specialized checklists for feature additions, bug fixes, UI refinements, refactoring, dependency updates, and infrastructure changes.
Code review and PR review skill for Python PySide6/Qt 6.8+ applications. Focuses on modern best practices, performance, thread safety, signal/slot patterns, Model/View architecture, QML integration, and async patterns. Use when reviewing Python Qt code, PySide6 PRs, GUI application code, or when asked to review code that uses QtWidgets, QtQuick, QtCore, QtGui, or any Qt module. Catches common anti-patterns, memory issues, thread violations, and suggests modern Qt 6.8+ idioms.
Git commit message best practices. Use when writing commit messages, reviewing commits, or setting up commit conventions for a project. Ensures clear, consistent, and useful commit history.
Commit standards for Engram contributors. Trigger: Any commit creation, review, or branch cleanup.
Orchestrate comprehensive code review across ~12 AI reviewers. 5 persona reviewers (Grug, Carmack, Ousterhout, Beck, Fowler) via Moonbridge, 4 domain specialists (security-sentinel MANDATORY, performance, data integrity, architecture) via Task, plus hindsight-reviewer and synthesis. Use when: code review, PR review, pre-merge quality check.
Use this skill when the user asks to review a PR, do a code review, check a pull request, "review this PR", "review-pr", or "look at this pull request". Requires Gitee MCP Server to be configured.
Use when monitoring a PR (or a full Graphite stack of PRs) that needs CI fixes or review comment responses. Runs as a long-running session with intelligent sleep intervals. Handles failing checks, reviewer feedback, and pushes verified fixes autonomously.
Parallel 3-reviewer code review orchestration: launch Security, Business-Logic, and Architecture reviewers simultaneously, aggregate findings by severity, and produce a unified BLOCK/FIX/APPROVE verdict. Use when reviewing PRs with 5+ files, security-sensitive changes, new features needing broad coverage, or when user requests "parallel review", "comprehensive review", or "full review". Do NOT use for single-file fixes, documentation-only changes, or when systematic-code-review (sequential) is sufficient.
4-phase code review methodology: UNDERSTAND changes, VERIFY claims against code, ASSESS security/performance/architecture risks, DOCUMENT findings with severity classification. Use when reviewing pull requests, auditing code before release, evaluating external contributions, or pre-merge verification. Use for "review PR", "code review", "audit code", "check this PR", or "review my changes". Do NOT use for writing new code or implementing features.