Loading...
Loading...
Found 68 Skills
Phase 2 of the issue process — Read the issue report + read the code, identify the true root cause and assess the repair risk, and finally provide the user with 2-3 repair plan options for them to decide. This phase is **not about starting to modify code** — after analysis, show the conclusion to the user first, and only proceed to Phase 3 after the user confirms the plan. The prerequisite dependency easysdd-issue-report has been completed. Trigger scenarios: The user says "analyze this bug", "find the root cause", "locate the issue", and the {slug}-report.md already exists in the issue directory.
Fix the findings recorded in a crate issue file one at a time, with failing test first, minimal fix second, full crate verification third, and issue-file status updates after each successful fix. Use for Rust crate issue lists that already exist and need disciplined sequential repair.
Phase 3 of the issue workflow —— Fix code precisely according to confirmed root causes and solutions, verify the results, and document it in {slug}-fix-note.md. This is the final stage of the issue workflow —— no verification closure means the workflow is incomplete. Two entry points: the standard path is triggered from cs-issue-analyze (with existing {slug}-analysis.md), and the fast track is triggered directly from cs-issue-report (without {slug}-analysis.md, as the root cause was identified by AI through code reading during the report phase). Trigger scenarios: User says "Start fixing the bug", "Fix according to the analysis", "Start modifying the code". During the fix, only modify the files specified in the solution; do not make incidental optimizations or introduce new abstractions —— these actions will cause the scope to expand to an untraceable extent.
Phase 2 of the issue process — Read the issue report + read the code, identify the true root cause and assess repair risks, and finally provide users with 2-3 repair solution options for them to decide. **Do NOT start modifying code in this phase** — present the conclusions to the user after analysis, and only proceed to Phase 3 after the user confirms the solution. Prerequisite: cs-issue-report has been completed. Trigger scenarios: The user says "Analyze this bug", "Find the root cause", "Locate the issue", and {slug}-report.md already exists in the issue directory.
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
Generates before/after verification pairs for loom plans. Proves a stage actually changed system behavior by capturing state before and after implementation. Use for delta-proof verification — proving new commands, endpoints, modules, or bug fixes work by comparing system state.
FORGE Quick Track — Spec + direct implementation for bug fixes and small changes. Usage: /forge-quick-spec "change description"
Rigorously collects and validates all fields needed to produce a complete, unambiguous prompt template for features and bug fixes. The skill asks targeted questions until the template is fully filled, consistent, and ready to paste into a Codex/GPT-5.2 coding session.
This skill should be used when fixing bugs, implementing features, debugging issues, or making code changes. Ensures understanding of code flow before implementation by: (1) Tracing execution path with specific file:line references, (2) Creating lightweight text diagrams showing class.method() flows, (3) Verifying understanding with user. Prevents wasted effort from assumptions or guessing. Triggers when users request: bug fixes, feature implementations, refactoring, TDD cycles, debugging, code analysis.
Systematic 4-phase debugging: understand the failure, form hypotheses, test one change at a time, fix with confidence. Activate when tests fail unexpectedly, errors occur, behavior is wrong, or something that worked before is now broken. Triggers on: "debug", "why is this failing", "test failure", "unexpected error", "bug", "broken".
Use when RLM requirement involves debugging a bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior. Insert Phase 1.5 between Phase 1 and Phase 2 to perform systematic root cause analysis before attempting any fixes.
Automated UI development loop: dev server + browser + implement + verify + fix. Launches dev server, implements via frontend-design skill, checks for errors (console, TypeScript, network), and iterates up to 5 times. USE WHEN: "implement next feature", "implement [description]", "verify the UI". NOT for one-off design/code tasks — use frontend-design directly for those. 6. Reports completion or escalates with detailed report **Triggers:** - "implement next feature", "implement the hero section" - "verify this implementation", "check the UI" - "fix the errors", "iterate on this" - "start dev server", "manage server"