Loading...
Loading...
Found 84 Skills
Propose concrete, high-leverage product/UX improvements to increase a software project's appeal and retention. Use when asked to generate product improvement proposals, UX ideas, onboarding/doc improvements, packaging/pricing positioning suggestions grounded in repo evidence, and prioritized MVP plans (ideation only; no implementation).
Provides startup advice using Eric Ries' Lean Startup methodology focusing on Build-Measure-Learn cycles, validated learning, and rapid experimentation. Use when advising on MVPs, product iterations, pivot decisions, growth metrics, or when user mentions Lean Startup, Eric Ries, validated learning, or rapid experimentation.
Help users break down product requirements into phased version plans. Triggered when users say "split versions", "version planning", "how to build MVP", "phased implementation".
Product design, feature planning, and technical architecture for new projects. Explores the problem space through deep requirements gathering, suggests creative features, makes architecture decisions, and produces a structured MVP plan with scope boundaries, a future roadmap, and a deliverable tracker. Uses plan mode for deliberate thinking before writing any artifacts. Use when the user says "mvp", "plan a product", "design features", "what should I build", "feature planning", "scope an MVP", or describes a product they want to plan.
Full-pipeline iOS App Store opportunity research. Discovers underserved niches, analyzes competitor gaps, estimates revenue, produces scored top-3 opportunity reports, and writes MVP PRDs — all through browser and web research. Use when the user wants to find profitable iOS app ideas, research App Store charts, analyze competitor apps (ratings, reviews, revenue, gaps), generate opportunity reports, or write MVP PRDs. Triggers on "find app opportunities", "app store research", "what app should I build", "research this app category", "find a gap in the app store", "ios app ideas".
Pressure-tests a product idea before the founder invests in planning, building, or launching. Surfaces fatal flaws, tests whether the problem is real, maps real competition (including current behavior), plans first 10 customers, defines a 2-week MVP test, returns a strong/weak/pivot verdict, then sharpens `docs/product-idea.md` based on the founder's direction calls. Use when the founder says "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "stress test my idea", or otherwise wants to evaluate an idea before committing.
Prevent feature creep when building software, apps, and AI-powered products. Use this skill when planning features, reviewing scope, building MVPs, managing backlogs, or when a user says "just one more feature." Helps developers and AI agents stay focused, ship faster, and avoid bloated products.
Create critical MVP application briefs through ruthless scope-cutting dialogue. Use when user wants to turn business ideas and processes into applications. Ruthlessly cuts scope, challenges overengineering, and focuses on minimum viable product to test hypotheses. Creates structured MVP briefs in .ideas/[name]/app.md. Triggers include "build an app", "MVP for this", "what should the application do", or readiness to design application.
Cut scope ruthlessly using Shape Up's appetite-first approach. Use when asked to reduce scope, find the MVP, trim features, ship faster, or figure out what to cut. Applies fixed time variable scope thinking and scope hammering techniques.
Qt application architecture, project structure, and entry-point patterns for PySide6, PyQt6, and C++/Qt. Use when structuring a Qt app, setting up QApplication, designing the main window, choosing between MVC/MVP patterns, organizing a src layout, or deciding how to separate concerns in a GUI application. Trigger phrases: "structure my Qt app", "QApplication setup", "app entry point", "Qt project layout", "organize Qt code", "Qt MVC", "Qt MVP", "main window architecture", "new Qt project"
Run structured multi-role design reviews and architecture debates for technical decisions. Use when Codex needs to compare options, pressure-test tradeoffs, recommend an MVP path, or simulate a meeting with distinct evaluation roles such as moderator, skeptic, pragmatist, minimalist, maximalist, retrieval architect, Granary workflow lead, semantic purist, lightweight contrarian, context economist, or workflow conservative.
Use when a user needs a staged working-backwards interview to clarify the customer problem, audience, value proposition, business case, MVP, requirements, risks, and success metrics before any PRFAQ is written. Supports `--quick-flow` for fast assumption-driven execution and `--full-flow` for question-driven verified execution. Explicit full or end-to-end spec refinement requests continue through the existing 18-stage refinement cascade.