Loading...
Loading...
Found 765 Skills
AscendC Operator Precision Evaluation. Generate a comprehensive precision test case set (≥30 cases) for the compiled and installed operator, run the tests and generate a precision verification report. Keywords: precision test, precision evaluation, precision report, accuracy, error analysis. After execution, YOU MUST display the overview, failure summary and key findings in the current conversation, and must not only attach the report path.
Debugging and Root Cause Localization for AscendC Operator Precision Issues. Used when operator precision tests fail (such as allclose failure, result deviation, all-zero/NaN output, etc.). Process: Error Distribution Analysis → Code Error-Prone Point Review → Experimental Isolation → printf/DumpTensor Instrumentation → Fix Verification. Keywords: precision debugging, precision issue, result inconsistency, error localization, allclose failure, output deviation, NaN, all-zero, precision debug.
Complete AscendC Operator Verification Testcase Generation - Help users with testcase design. Use this skill when users mention testcase design, generalized testcase generation, operator benchmark, UT testcase, precision testcase, or performance testcase.
Task Orchestration for Full-Process Development of Ascend Triton Operators. Used when users need to develop Triton Operators, covering the complete workflow of environment configuration → requirement design → code generation → static inspection → precision verification → performance evaluation → document generation → performance optimization.
Post-implementation quality check via fresh-eyes review. Chain: Implement → Review (independent agent) → Resolve (if issues). Max 2 rounds. Auto-triggers for security-sensitive and data-mutation code. Not for code refactoring (use code-cleanup). Not for decision analysis (use agent-room). For post-deploy verification, see deploy-verify. For shipping and PRs, see ship.
Use when the user asks about chaos engineering, fault injection, resilience testing, or HA verification for a SPECIFIC AWS service (e.g., RDS, EKS, MSK, ElastiCache, DynamoDB, S3, Lambda, OpenSearch, etc.). Triggers on "chaos testing on [service]", "fault injection for [service]", "how to test HA of [service]", "FIS scenarios/actions for [service]", "[service] failover testing", "[service] resilience testing", "[service] 混沌测试", "[service] 故障注入", "[service] 高可用验证", "对 [service] 做混沌实验", "test my [service]", "verify my [service] is resilient". Use this skill even when the user phrases it casually like "test my RDS" or "how resilient is my MSK cluster".
Converts Markdown files to one MS Word document per file using plugin-local scripts. V2 includes L5 Delegated Constraint Verification for strict binary artifact linting.
Use when starting new feature work to create isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification. Keeps main branch clean while developing.
Decode and inspect JSON Web Tokens (JWTs) without verification. Use when the user provides a JWT string and wants to see its header, payload, or claims — e.g. "decode this JWT", "what's in this token", "inspect this JWT", "show me the claims", "parse this token". Also triggers on raw JWT strings (three base64url segments separated by dots).
Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, structuring arguments, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, reviewer guidelines, and citation verification workflows.
Rigorous mathematical proof verification and fixing workflow. Reads a LaTeX proof, identifies gaps via cross-model review (Codex GPT-5.4 xhigh), fixes each gap with full derivations, re-reviews, and generates an audit report. Use when user says "检查证明", "verify proof", "proof check", "审证明", "check this proof", or wants rigorous mathematical verification of a theory paper.
Zero-context verification that every bibliographic entry in the paper is real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited paper actually supports. Uses a fresh cross-model reviewer with web/DBLP/arXiv lookup to catch hallucinated authors, wrong years, fabricated venues, version mismatches, and wrong-context citations (cite present but the cited paper does not establish the claim). Use when user says "审查引用", "check citations", "citation audit", "verify references", "引用核对", or before submission to ensure bibliography integrity.