Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,266 Skills
Audit and improve SQL quality systematically — catch performance smells in raw SQL, ORM-generated queries, schema/modeling decisions, migrations, or PR diffs, explain the database-level impact, give a corrected version, and make the tradeoff explicit. Generic by design: no project, domain, ORM, or language config — any context it needs (is this table transactional? is the scan intentional? what volume is expected?) is raised during analysis, never assumed. Reach for it whenever someone writes, reviews, or optimizes a query or data-access code — "review this query", "why is this slow", "check my migration", "is this index right", or when you see N+1, SELECT *, a cartesian/row explosion, three-plus joins, a missing date filter on a growing table, OFFSET pagination, LIKE '%term%', NOT IN with nullable columns, an unindexed ORDER BY, an unbounded list, or a long transaction — even when they never say the word "SQL". Use it both to validate new code and designs and to audit existing ones.
Applies and explains code conventions across TypeScript, React, C#, and Markdown. Enforces naming rules, file naming patterns, TSDoc and XML doc standards, inline comment intent (the *why*, not the *what*), code structure, error handling, async patterns, and dead code policy. Also enforces ADR and contributor doc decisions, and flags decisions that appear stale or misaligned with current tooling. USE FOR: convention questions, code review against project standards, applying naming rules, auditing intent comments, checking TSDoc completeness, enforcing recorded ADR decisions, and flagging stale architectural decisions. DO NOT USE FOR: security vulnerability scanning, performance profiling, runtime debugging, or generating net-new code without a review target.
The durable documentation set that makes an AI-built (vibe-coded) app reviewable before shipping. A small core every app needs — architecture, user/permission flows, permissions, variables/secrets, and a test-coverage map — plus conditional docs added only when they apply: emails, scheduled work, SEO, and embedded agents/automation. Defines what each doc must capture and how a reviewer or auditor uses it. Use when documenting a codebase for handoff, mapping user journeys and trust-boundary crossings, planning test coverage, or preparing for a security or performance audit.
Validate whether an implementation matches its stated goal. Use this skill when a skill or agent wants a second opinion on its own output, when the user says "check this implementation", "validate what you did", "is this correct?", "review the output", or "did you do this right?". Also spawned automatically as a subagent by other skills (memory-bridge, daily-update) to self-check their outputs before presenting to the user. Returns a structured pass/warn/fail verdict with specific actionable issues.
Iteratively review changes, run automated tests, and apply targeted fixes until issues are resolved (or a stop condition is reached).
Detect and remediate Go anti-patterns: premature interface abstraction, goroutine overkill, context soup, error wrapping mistakes, generic abuse, channel misuse, unnecessary function extraction, and interface pollution. Use when reviewing Go code for quality, detecting over-engineering, or when user mentions "anti-pattern", "code smell", "Go mistake", or "bad Go". Do NOT use for feature implementation, performance optimization without a code smell, or non-Go languages.
Use this skill for cross-model code reviews using OpenAI Codex CLI via MCP. Activates on mentions of codex review, cross-model review, code review with codex, peer review, review my code, review this PR, review changes, codex check, second opinion, or gpt review.
Automate pull request workflows with templates, checklists, auto-merge rules, and review assignments. Reduce manual overhead and improve consistency.
Security code review for vulnerabilities. Use when asked to "security review", "find vulnerabilities", "check for security issues", "audit security", "OWASP review", or review code for injection, XSS, authentication, authorization, cryptography issues. Provides systematic review with confidence-based reporting.
Comprehensive TypeScript file audit system. Command-only skill (no natural triggers). Accepts file or directory path to systematically audit through accelint-ts-testing, accelint-ts-best-practices, accelint-ts-performance, and accelint-ts-documentation skills. Maintains progress tracking across sessions with interactive change approval. Uses isolated git worktrees to enable parallel audits without conflicts.
Improve, debug, and extend an existing Contentful App Framework custom app in a customer's own repository. Use when users provide a bug report, feature request, support note, customer feedback, or direct change request for an existing custom app, including app configuration, sidebar, field editor, dialog, page, home, App Action, Function, installation parameters, local validation, or PR preparation. Also triggers on "fix my Contentful app", "improve a custom app", "enhance App Framework app", "debug custom app", "update sidebar app", and "custom app feature request". Not for creating a brand new app from scratch (contentful-custom-app-from-scratch), generic API examples (contentful-api), migrations (contentful-migration), or website integration (contentful-nextjs).
Use when reviewing or generating Swift code for modern idiom correctness — catches outdated APIs, pre-Swift 5.5 patterns, and Foundation legacy usage that Claude defaults to