Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,194 Skills
Expert code review specialist for quality, security, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code changes, ensuring high development standards, or conducting security audits. Provides actionable feedback organized by priority.
Use when implementing features from a spec or requirements document, doing multi-phase work, or when you need structured Analyze-Plan-Ask-Execute-Review cycles to prevent ad-hoc coding and ensure spec-aligned, pattern-consistent implementations
Applies principles from Robert C. Martin's 'Clean Code'. Use this skill when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to ensure high quality, readability, and maintainability. Covers naming, functions, comments, error handling, and class design.
Use this skill for multi-model AI code review. Trigger whenever the user asks to review code changes, audit a diff, check code quality, review a PR, review commits, or review uncommitted changes before pushing or merging. Also trigger when they say 'code review', 'review my changes', 'check this before I merge', or want multiple perspectives on code. Runs Codex and Claude reviews in parallel, then synthesizes a unified report. Do NOT use for reviewing documentation, markdown, or non-code files, or for trivial single-line changes.
Daily coding assistant that auto-triggers when writing/modifying code, providing a core checklist. ✅ Trigger scenarios: - Implementing new features, adding code, modifying existing code - User requests "write a...", "implement...", "add...", "modify..." - Any coding task involving Edit/Write tools ❌ Does not trigger: - Pure reading/understanding code (no modification intent) - Already covered by specialized skills (bug-detective, architecture-design, tdd-guide) - Configuration file changes, documentation writing
Coordinates performance optimization: algorithm, query, and runtime workers in parallel
Clean AI-generated code slop with a test-first, deletion-first deslop workflow and optional reviewer-only mode
Use when the user wants to review a pull request, understand what a PR changes, assess risk of merging, or check for missing test coverage. Examples: "Review this PR", "What does PR #42 change?", "Is this PR safe to merge?"
Master Git hooks setup with Husky, lint-staged, pre-commit framework, and commitlint. Automate code quality gates, formatting, linting, and commit message enforcement before code reaches CI.
Run a comprehensive Go-to-Market and launch readiness review for a project phase. Combines marketing content audit, code quality review, performance audit, accessibility audit, infrastructure readiness, and business review with council evaluation. Use before phase launches or when GTM review issues are ready.
Safe, phase-gated refactoring: CHARACTERIZE with tests, PLAN incremental steps, EXECUTE one change at a time, VALIDATE no regressions. Use when renaming functions/variables, extracting modules, changing signatures, restructuring directories, or consolidating duplicate code. Use for "refactor", "rename", "extract", "restructure", or "migrate pattern". Do NOT use for bug fixes or new feature implementation.
Go-specific code review with 6-phase methodology: Context, Automated Checks, Quality Analysis, Specific Analysis, Line-by-Line, Documentation. Use when reviewing Go code, PRs, or auditing Go codebases for quality and best practices. Use for "review Go", "Go PR", "check Go code", "Go quality", "review .go". Do NOT use for writing new Go code, debugging Go bugs, or refactoring -- use golang-general-engineer, systematic-debugging, or systematic-refactoring for those tasks.