Loading...
Loading...
Found 33 Skills
Use when you find additional work needed during task execution that's not in the original task description, to report it to ZŌE for review
Use when asked to review a plan, challenge a proposal, run a CEO review, poke holes in an approach, think bigger about scope, or decide whether to expand or reduce the plan.
Guide for Lightdash's CASL-based authorization system. Use when working with scopes, custom roles, abilities, permissions, ForbiddenError, authorization, or access control. Helps with adding new scopes, debugging permission issues, understanding the permission flow, and creating custom roles.
Expert in protecting projects from scope creep. Covers requirement management, stakeholder negotiation, saying no diplomatically, and keeping projects focused. Understands that scope creep kills more projects than technical debt. Use when "scope creep, feature request, can we also, while you're at it, one more thing, requirements changed, scope management, " mentioned.
Structured specification with explicit scope boundaries: user stories, acceptance criteria, out-of-scope definition, risks, and estimation. Positions before feature-design in the feature lifecycle pipeline. Use when: "write spec", "user stories", "define requirements", "scope this", "what should this do", "acceptance criteria", "define scope"
Cut scope ruthlessly using Shape Up's appetite-first approach. Use when asked to reduce scope, find the MVP, trim features, ship faster, or figure out what to cut. Applies fixed time variable scope thinking and scope hammering techniques.
CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Three modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials).
You MUST use this when a request needs design decisions before code — new features, product or UX behavior, architecture changes, unclear success criteria, or two materially different approaches. Explicitly specified mechanical refactors, localized fixes with known expected behavior, and single-outcome config changes go straight to implementation.
Decompose work into well-sized, well-ordered implementation units and plan each one thoroughly. Use when the user asks to "plan this implementation", "break this into steps", "help me plan the work", "decompose this into tasks", "create an implementation plan", "how should I break down this project", or "size this work".