Loading...
Loading...
Found 39 Skills
Orchestrator that runs scope then language then framework then library then cognitive review skills in order and aggregates all findings into one report. Does not perform analysis itself.
GitLab discussion operations via API. ALWAYS use this skill when user wants to: (1) view threaded discussions on MRs/issues, (2) create new discussion threads, (3) reply to discussions, (4) resolve/unresolve discussions.
Review current uncommitted git changes with full file context and produce a structured report with severity levels, actionable fixes, and an approval verdict.
Use this skill when the user asks to review a PR, do a code review, check a pull request, "review this PR", "review-pr", or "look at this pull request". Requires Gitee MCP Server to be configured.
Use this skill when the user asks to review their local git changes, staged or unstaged diffs, or wants a code review before committing. Triggers on "review my changes", "review staged", "review my diff", "check my code", "code review local changes", "review unstaged", "review before commit".
Run a comprehensive multi-perspective code review on current changes. Activates the Review Council (security, quality, documentation, domain review) and runs automated security scanning. Use before creating a pull request or when you want a thorough review of your work.
Bridge between OMO Prometheus and TKT ticket lifecycle. Generates structured review context for Prometheus after bundle close, converts Prometheus plans into TKT bundle commands, writes review feedback into the Review Agent Inbox, and provides a structured question protocol for gathering information efficiently. Load this skill when you need to: (1) generate a review prompt for a completed ticket/bundle, (2) convert a Prometheus plan.md into TKT worker tickets, (3) write review feedback back into the ticket system, (4) ask structured questions using the question tool across all scenarios (requirements, decisions, review, planning).
Use when the user asks for a broad codebase review, substantial PR/branch review, architecture audit, tech-debt scan, cleanup assessment, structural sanity check, or design-alignment review. Default workflow: use sub-agents when available unless specifically forbidden; do not require the user to mention sub-agents, council mode, delegation, or parallel review. Focus on cruft, duplication, weak boundaries, missed reuse, lifecycle/concurrency risks, test/roadmap drift, and code aesthetics. Do not use for narrow bug fixes, ordinary small-diff reviews, frontend visual QA, repo-onboarding docs, or OpenAI Agents SDK production-readiness review. Output evidence-backed findings first, then pressure points, design alignment, open questions, and follow-through.
Comprehensive Elixir/Phoenix code review with optional parallel agents
Multi-agent PR and code review workflow for projects using multiple AI assistants (Claude, GitHub Copilot/Codex, Gemini Code Assist). Use when working with pull requests, code reviews, commits, or addressing review feedback. Teaches how to check all feedback sources (conversation, inline, reviews), respond to inline bot comments, create Fix Reports, and coordinate between agents that use different comment formats. Critical for ensuring no feedback is missed from external review bots.
Review a GitLab Merge Request and provide findings, and post structured review comments with issue explanation plus pseudo code fixes. Use this skill when asked to review a Gitlab Merge request.
Use when reviewing code, pull requests, patches, CLs, diffs, or proposed implementations for engineering quality, code health, design, functionality, tests, maintainability, specialist risk, or approval risk. TRIGGER on "review this PR", "code review", "LGTM?", "approve?", "is this code/diff/change safe to merge/deploy?", and local diff reviews. DO NOT TRIGGER for PR descriptions, PR splitting, author review-feedback responses, or non-code safety questions unless code review is requested.