Loading...
Loading...
Found 182 Skills
Research-driven code review and validation at multiple levels of abstraction. Two modes: (1) Session review — after making changes, review and verify work using parallel reviewers that research-validate every assumption; (2) Full codebase audit — deep end-to-end evaluation using parallel teams of subagent-spawning reviewers. Use when reviewing changes, verifying work quality, auditing a codebase, validating correctness, checking assumptions, finding defects, reducing complexity. NOT for writing new code, explaining code, or benchmarking.
Execute a phased implementation plan using subagents. Use when asked to execute, run, or carry out a plan — especially one created by make-plan.
Agent skill for code-review-swarm - invoke with $agent-code-review-swarm
Conduct an architecture health check on a design — either verify if the design is internally consistent (no conflicts between terminology, contracts, and implementation steps) or check if the design aligns with the code (ensuring what was promised in the design is actually implemented in code). This skill only outputs issue lists and repair suggestions, and does not make any modifications. It focuses on only one target each time; "顺手把另一项也查了" is not allowed. Trigger scenarios: Users say "perform architecture check", "is the design internally consistent?", "does the plan align with the code?", or want to conduct a health check before proceeding to the implement/acceptance phase.
Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability
Help teams continuously improve skills, automatically identify skill optimization opportunities (such as missing essential information, format issues, version update needs, etc.), execute secure update processes (backup, modification, testing, restoration), and ensure skill quality keeps improving as the project progresses
Code review a pull request
Multi-dimensional code review with structured reports. Analyzes correctness, readability, performance, security, testing, and architecture. Triggers on "review code", "code review", "审查代码", "代码审查".
pytest, data validation, Great Expectations, and quality assurance for data systems
Build comprehensive, mobile-compatible Obsidian study vaults from academic course materials with checkpoint-based workflow, error pattern recognition, and quality assurance. Battle-tested patterns from 828KB/37-file projects. Works across all subjects - CS, medicine, business, self-study.
PR review with parallel specialized agents. Use when reviewing pull requests or code.
Perform general code reviews for PRs and code changes. Evaluate code quality, security, and design based on common standards to make approve/reject decisions. Use this for requests like "Review this PR", "Do a code review", "Pre-merge check", or when executing the gh pr view command.