Loading...
Loading...
Found 114 Skills
Implement Git hooks using Husky, pre-commit, and custom scripts. Enforce code quality, linting, and testing before commits and pushes.
Set up or verify Husky git hooks to ensure all tests run and coverage stays above 80% (configurable) for Node.js/TypeScript projects. This skill should be used when users want to enforce test coverage through pre-commit hooks, verify existing Husky/test setup, or configure coverage thresholds for Jest, Vitest, or Mocha test runners.
Run security audit with GitLeaks pre-commit hook setup and code analysis
Set up Biome for fast linting and formatting in JavaScript/TypeScript projects, including editor integration, package scripts, optional pre-commit hooks, and migration from ESLint + Prettier. Use when adding or standardizing lint/format tooling, replacing ESLint/Prettier, or troubleshooting Biome configuration and workflow issues.
Implement FireCrawl lint rules, policy enforcement, and automated guardrails. Use when setting up code quality rules for FireCrawl integrations, implementing pre-commit hooks, or configuring CI policy checks for FireCrawl best practices. Trigger with phrases like "firecrawl policy", "firecrawl lint", "firecrawl guardrails", "firecrawl best practices check", "firecrawl eslint".
Invoke this skill when a user shares test code and questions whether it actually works as intended — not to run or fix the test, but to evaluate whether the test has real value. Triggers on: "is this test any good?", "would this catch a real bug?", "this test always passes — is that normal?", "review these tests before I commit", or "does this test verify anything meaningful?". Also triggers when someone suspects a test is useless, wants a pre-commit quality gate, or is unsure if an auto-generated test is worth keeping. The core question this skill answers: "Would this test fail if the feature broke?" If not, the test gets rejected. Do NOT use for generating new tests, fixing failing tests, or exploring application features.
Selects, configures, and integrates a static analysis tool for the project's language. Covers tool selection, rule configuration, CI integration, fixing existing violations, and pre-commit hook setup. Invoked when the user asks to add linting, set up static analysis, or configure a code quality tool.
Run comprehensive PR checks including reviewing CodeRabbit comments, ensuring PR description quality, running pre-commit hooks, tests, and validation. Use on an existing PR to address review feedback.
Pre-commit quality checklist covering lint, typecheck, tests, code-spec sync, API changes, database migrations, cross-layer verification, and manual testing. Blocks commit if infra or cross-layer specs lack executable depth. Use when code is written and tested but not yet committed, before submitting changes, or as a final review before git commit.
GitHub workflow for ToolUniverse - push code safely by moving temp files, activating pre-commit hooks, running tests, and cleaning staged files. Use when pushing to GitHub, fixing CI failures, or cleaning up before commits.
Set up and configure Git pre-commit hooks for code quality, secrets scanning, and commit message validation. Use when installing git hooks, configuring pre-commit checks, or enforcing code standards.
Review local git changes from 8 expert perspectives using multi-agent team orchestration. Produces a consolidated report with Critical/Important/Nice-to-have severity levels. Lightweight pre-commit or pre-push quality gate — no PR or branch push required. Use when the user asks to review local changes, check changes before committing, get a team review of working tree changes, or run a pre-commit review. Trigger phrases include "review local", "review my changes", "review local changes", "pre-commit review", "review before commit", "review before push", "team review my changes", "check my changes", "review working tree", "local code review", "review diff", "review my diff".