Loading...
Loading...
Found 59 Skills
Peter Thiel's Monopoly Creation framework applied to a business idea. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Monopoly Anatomist, Secret Hunter, Market Framer, Last Mover Analyst, Girardian — who each apply a distinct lens from Thiel's framework to evaluate whether a venture has genuine monopoly potential. The lead synthesizes into a verdict: does this company have a secret, a 10x advantage, a tiny domination-ready market, and a path to becoming the last mover in its category? Use when the user says "thiel this", "monopoly test", "zero to one analysis", "does this have monopoly potential", or proposes a venture and wants Thiel-style evaluation. Works standalone or after /office-hours and /munger.
Applies cognitive science frameworks for creative thinking to CS and AI research ideation. Use when seeking genuinely novel research directions by leveraging combinatorial creativity, analogical reasoning, constraint manipulation, and other empirically grounded creative strategies.
Makes AI-generated content sound genuinely human — not just cleaned up, but alive. Use when content feels robotic, uses too many AI clichés, lacks personality, or reads like it was written by committee. Triggers: 'this sounds like AI', 'make it more human', 'add personality', 'it feels generic', 'sounds robotic', 'fix AI writing', 'inject our voice'. NOT for initial content creation (use content-production). NOT for SEO optimization (use content-production Mode 3).
Generates genuinely novel, useful ideas for products, businesses, features, campaigns, names, research directions, and process redesign. Use when the user asks to brainstorm, ideate, improve a weak concept, escape generic answers, find differentiated options under real constraints, or turn a vague opportunity into a shortlist of strong concepts with wedges and tests. Preserves diversity with independent idea pools, analogy transfer, contradiction solving, critique-and-repair, and reality checks. Do not use for simple rewriting, proofreading, or purely factual research.
Graham cigar-butt batch screener — runs Benjamin Graham's NCAV / net-net / defensive-investor hard filters across an index or market universe and returns a ranked candidate list with NCAV ratio, PE, PB, dividend yield, debt coverage, 5y earnings stability, Graham buy price, and a dynamic value-trap warning. Longbridge CLI/MCP first; WebSearch fills genuine gaps (PMI, sector outlook). Every figure footnoted to its source. Auto-switches model for banks / insurance / REITs and flags <2y IPOs and suspended names. Triggers: "格雷厄姆筛选", "格雷厄姆选股", "捡烟蒂榜单", "烟蒂股榜", "NCAV筛选", "NCAV排行榜", "净流动资产筛选", "防御型投资者选股", "撿煙蒂榜單", "煙蒂股榜", "NCAV篩選", "淨流動資產篩選", "防禦型投資者選股", "Graham screen", "Graham screener", "NCAV screen", "net-net screen", "net-net list", "cigar-butt screen", "defensive investor screen", "liquidation value screen", "Benjamin Graham screen".
Use when the user wants text to sound more human, says writing sounds "too AI" or "too ChatGPT," asks to humanize or rewrite a draft to feel natural, or shares content wanting it to feel authentic and less robotic. Also applies to LinkedIn posts, blog drafts, or emails where the user wants a more genuine voice.
Expert in building crypto-native communities - token holder communities, NFT communities, DAO governance, alpha groups, and navigating the unique dynamics of Web3 culture. Covers managing speculation, building through bear markets, and creating genuine value beyond price. Use when "web3 community, crypto community, token community, nft community, dao community, alpha group, holder community, crypto discord, " mentioned.
Make text more genuine, natural, and feel not written by an AI or LLM by removing AI tropes and cliches. Use when asked to deslopify, naturalize, or remove AI tropes from text.
You are a Reddit culture expert who understands that success on Reddit requires genuine value creation, not promotional messaging. You're fluent in Reddit's unique ecosystem, community guidelines, ...
Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
Captures and organizes chaotic brain dumps into a structured, actionable system with zero information loss. Use this skill whenever the user says 'capture this', 'brain dump', 'let me dump some ideas', 'I've got a bunch of thoughts', 'here's everything on my mind', 'idea dump', 'let me get this out of my head', 'I need to organize my thoughts', 'here's what I'm thinking', or any variation where someone is unloading a messy stream of ideas, tasks, thoughts, and plans wanting them turned into something coherent. Also trigger when the user pastes or dictates a long, unstructured block of mixed ideas — even without the exact phrase — the intent is the same. Fast-to-action by design: no upfront intake. Output is four sections (Projects/Ideas, Tasks, Connections, How I Can Help) ending with a directive question. Asks at most one mid-organization clarifying question when a single item is genuinely ambiguous between task and project.
Expert guide for creating authentic, human-sounding content that avoids AI-generated writing patterns. Use when reviewing, editing, or creating content to ensure it sounds genuinely human and avoids AI detection markers.