Loading...
Loading...
Found 46 Skills
Expert guide for creating authentic, human-sounding content that avoids AI-generated writing patterns. Use when reviewing, editing, or creating content to ensure it sounds genuinely human and avoids AI detection markers.
Apply principles of good design taste when creating, reviewing, or critiquing any creative or technical work. Use this skill whenever the user asks you to design something, review a design, create UI/UX, architect a system, write something with aesthetic intent, evaluate the quality of code or creative work, or asks for feedback on whether something is "good." Also trigger when users mention taste, aesthetics, beauty in design, elegance, simplicity, or when they want help making something not just functional but genuinely well-crafted. This skill applies across domains: software, writing, visual design, architecture, presentations, APIs, data models, and more. Even if the user doesn't explicitly mention "design," use this skill when the underlying task is about making something better, more elegant, or more refined.
You are a Reddit culture expert who understands that success on Reddit requires genuine value creation, not promotional messaging. You're fluent in Reddit's unique ecosystem, community guidelines, ...
Captures and organizes chaotic brain dumps into a structured, actionable system with zero information loss. Use this skill whenever the user says 'capture this', 'brain dump', 'let me dump some ideas', 'I've got a bunch of thoughts', 'here's everything on my mind', 'idea dump', 'let me get this out of my head', 'I need to organize my thoughts', 'here's what I'm thinking', or any variation where someone is unloading a messy stream of ideas, tasks, thoughts, and plans wanting them turned into something coherent. Also trigger when the user pastes or dictates a long, unstructured block of mixed ideas — even without the exact phrase — the intent is the same. Fast-to-action by design: no upfront intake. Output is four sections (Projects/Ideas, Tasks, Connections, How I Can Help) ending with a directive question. Asks at most one mid-organization clarifying question when a single item is genuinely ambiguous between task and project.
Run any question, idea, or decision through a council of 5 AI advisors who independently analyze it, peer-review each other anonymously, and synthesize a final verdict. Based on Karpathy's LLM Council methodology. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: 'council this', 'run the council', 'war room this', 'pressure-test this', 'stress-test this', 'debate this'. STRONG TRIGGERS (use when combined with a real decision or tradeoff): 'should I X or Y', 'which option', 'what would you do', 'is this the right move', 'validate this', 'get multiple perspectives', 'I can't decide', 'I'm torn between'. Do NOT trigger on simple yes/no questions, factual lookups, or casual 'should I' without a meaningful tradeoff (e.g. 'should I use markdown' is not a council question). DO trigger when the user presents a genuine decision with stakes, multiple options, and context that suggests they want it pressure-tested from multiple angles.
Orchestrate multiple code-writing agents in parallel when the work contains 3 or more genuinely independent build tasks. Use for execution lanes with disjoint write scope, clear task boundaries, and no dependency edges that would force sequencing.
Compare UX patterns across multiple reference apps using pattern libraries produced by ux-extract. Reads 2+ pattern-library.md files, walks them category by category, identifies where apps converge (strong signal), where they diverge (genuine design choice), what's unique to one app, and what's absent across the set. Produces an opinionated comparison document with recommendations for a new build. No browser needed — pure markdown analysis. Trigger with 'compare UX patterns', 'how do top apps handle X', 'ux comparison', 'pattern comparison across reference apps'.
Makes AI-generated content sound genuinely human — not just cleaned up, but alive. Use when content feels robotic, uses too many AI clichés, lacks personality, or reads like it was written by committee. Triggers: 'this sounds like AI', 'make it more human', 'add personality', 'it feels generic', 'sounds robotic', 'fix AI writing', 'inject our voice'. NOT for initial content creation (use content-production). NOT for SEO optimization (use content-production Mode 3).
Detects AI-written text, scores it against a detection rubric, provides line-by-line edit recommendations, and rewrites content to sound genuinely human. Use when the user asks to 'humanize' text, detect AI writing, remove 'AI voice,' make copy 'less robotic,' pass AI detection tools, or rewrite content to 'sound human.'
Expert in building crypto-native communities - token holder communities, NFT communities, DAO governance, alpha groups, and navigating the unique dynamics of Web3 culture. Covers managing speculation, building through bear markets, and creating genuine value beyond price. Use when "web3 community, crypto community, token community, nft community, dao community, alpha group, holder community, crypto discord, " mentioned.
NEVER escalate without investigation first. This is the Iron Law. Use when evaluating whether to escalate models, facing genuine complexity requiring deeper reasoning, novel patterns with no existing solutions, high-stakes decisions requiring capability investment. Do not use when thrashing without investigation - investigate root cause first. DO NOT use when: time pressure alone - urgency doesn't change task complexity. DO NOT use when: "just to be safe" - assess actual complexity instead.
Parliamentary procedure as forcing function for genuine deliberation