Loading...
Loading...
Found 62 Skills
Research on Historical Isomorphism and Standard Answers. Abstract the complex dilemma the user is facing into a structural fingerprint, search for truly isomorphic successful cases, failed cases, and counterexamples in business history, management history, technology history, career history, and institutional history. Compare the constraints, decisions, and outcomes of the parties involved, and extract recurring solutions, applicable conditions, and failure boundaries. Trigger methods: /dbs-standard-answer, /标准答案 (Standard Answer), "Who faced similar problems in history?", "Has anyone encountered this situation before?", "How did they resolve it back then?", "Is there a classic solution to this problem?", "First help me find historical analogies?", "What was the standard answer in the past?". Find structurally analogous historical cases and evidence-backed standard answers. Use when the user wants to situate a current dilemma in history, compare how others addressed it, and extract recurring mechanisms with conditions and limits.
Daily Review Assistant - An AI-assisted decision-making tool for cleaning up knowledge inboxes. The Agent provides "Keep/Delete" suggestions with reasons, and users manually execute after confirmation. Following the principle of "Collect without judging, make decisions during daily review", complete daily knowledge organization in 5-10 minutes. Triggers: /daily-review, /日清, /review
Query schelling.sh for recurring, decision-shaped problems. Retrieve defaults and risks from prior cases, then attach durable follow-up learning. Works for Markdown deliverables when memory should steer decisions. Needs network.
Use when facing complex decisions, architectural trade-offs, philosophical questions, or any problem requiring deep analysis before action. Use when the user asks to "think deeply", "question assumptions", "analyze from first principles", "challenge this decision", debates between two approaches (e.g. monolith vs microservices, build vs buy, SSR vs CSR), or invokes /socrates. Also triggered when other skills need a thinking engine for rigorous pre-analysis. Even if the problem seems simple, if there are hidden assumptions worth examining, this skill applies.
Multi-framework intelligence brief. Takes any business situation, investment thesis, career decision, or strategic problem and runs it through 4-7 of 11 analytical frameworks (Feynman, Kahneman, Shannon, Tetlock, Duke, Munger, Thiel, Helmer, Christensen, Meadows, Taleb, Bezos). Each framework runs as a distinct sub-analysis producing concrete claims. Contradictions between analyses are surfaced explicitly. Synthesizes into a single brief: Core Argument, Key Insight, load-bearing conditions, failure modes with numeric probabilities, validation tests, recommended action with sizing, and the strongest dissent. Use when the user says "think through this", "analyze this for me", "help me decide", "think", "/think", or presents any complex decision, investment thesis, business question, or strategic problem that warrants structured multi-framework analysis.
Charlie Munger's Mental Lattice applied to a business idea. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Mathematician, Psychologist, Inverter, Economist, Moat Analyst — who each apply their discipline's elementary models to the idea. The lead synthesizes into a lollapalooza analysis: which forces stack, which fight you, and the honest Munger verdict. Use when the user says "munger this", "apply the lattice", "what would Charlie think", or proposes a business idea and wants multidisciplinary analysis. Works as a standalone analysis or after /office-hours.
Evidence-based Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) assessment skill modeled after the Micromedex Drug-Reax methodology. Trigger this skill whenever the user types /drug-drug, mentions "drug interaction", "DDI", "drug-drug", "can I take X with Y", "interaction between", "交互作用", "併用", or asks whether two medications can be used together. This skill performs systematic literature retrieval via PubMed, CrossRef, and WebSearch, then produces a structured assessment report with Severity, Documentation, Onset, Mechanism, Clinical Effects, and Management — mirroring the Micromedex Drug-Reax classification framework. Even casual questions like "is it safe to combine A and B" should trigger this skill.
Multi-agent discussion rooms — debate or poll a problem from multiple perspectives. Standalone or invoked by other skills as a sub-routine. Mode=debate: N agents argue in rounds, converge. Mode=poll: N agents independently analyze, aggregate by consensus. Not for implementation (use system-architecture). Not for verification (use review-chain). For clarifying requirements first, see discover. For decomposing work after a decision, see task-breakdown.
What-if scenario analyzer for sports. Play-calling recommendations, clock management, substitution patterns, risk/reward calculations.
Comprehensive drug-drug interaction (DDI) prediction and risk assessment. Analyzes interaction mechanisms (CYP450, transporters, pharmacodynamic), severity classification, clinical evidence grading, and provides management strategies. Supports single drug pairs, polypharmacy analysis (3+ drugs), and alternative drug recommendations. Use when users ask about drug interactions, medication safety, polypharmacy risks, or need DDI assessment for clinical decision support.
Run any question, idea, or decision through a council of 5 AI advisors who independently analyze it, peer-review each other anonymously, and synthesize a final verdict. Based on Karpathy's LLM Council methodology. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: 'council this', 'run the council', 'war room this', 'pressure-test this', 'stress-test this', 'debate this'. STRONG TRIGGERS (use when combined with a real decision or tradeoff): 'should I X or Y', 'which option', 'what would you do', 'is this the right move', 'validate this', 'get multiple perspectives', 'I can't decide', 'I'm torn between'. Do NOT trigger on simple yes/no questions, factual lookups, or casual 'should I' without a meaningful tradeoff (e.g. 'should I use markdown' is not a council question). DO trigger when the user presents a genuine decision with stakes, multiple options, and context that suggests they want it pressure-tested from multiple angles.
C-suite orchestration layer that routes founder questions to the right advisor role(s), triggers multi-role board meetings for complex decisions, synthesizes outputs, tracks decisions, and manages cross-functional alignment. Every C-suite interaction starts here. Use when coordinating executive decisions, routing strategic questions, managing board meetings, synthesizing multi-perspective advice, tracking decision history, resolving inter-department conflicts, or when user mentions chief of staff, orchestrator, c-suite coordinator, executive routing, board coordination, decision synthesis, advisor routing, multi-agent coordination, or strategic orchestration.