Loading...
Loading...
Found 74 Skills
Vector database implementation for AI/ML applications, semantic search, and RAG systems. Use when building chatbots, search engines, recommendation systems, or similarity-based retrieval. Covers Qdrant (primary), Pinecone, Milvus, pgvector, Chroma, embedding generation (OpenAI, Voyage, Cohere), chunking strategies, and hybrid search patterns.
Use when developing business strategy (market entry, product launch, geographic expansion, M&A, turnaround), conducting competitive analysis (profiling competitors, assessing competitive threats, Porter's 5 Forces, identifying differentiation), applying strategic frameworks (Good Strategy kernel with diagnosis/guiding policy/coherent actions, SWOT, Blue Ocean Strategy, Playing to Win where-to-play/how-to-win, Value Chain Analysis, BCG Matrix), making strategic decisions under constraints (build vs buy, pricing strategy, market positioning, business model choices), planning strategic initiatives (annual planning, OKRs, roadmaps), evaluating competitive positioning (moats, sustainable advantages, differentiation vs cost leadership), or when user mentions "strategy", "competitive analysis", "Porter's 5 Forces", "SWOT", "market positioning", "strategic planning", "competitive landscape", or "strategic frameworks".
World-class character and art style consistency for AI-generated images and videos - ensures visual coherence across series, maintains character identity, and provides rigorous QA before deliveryUse when "character consistency, art style, same character, consistent character, visual continuity, series, turnaround sheet, character sheet, reference image, character bible, style guide, anime character, consistent look, face consistency, outfit consistency, lora training, ip-adapter, flux kontext, visual qa, art quality, generation review, style drift, character drift, character-consistency, art-style, visual-qa, ai-art, image-generation, video-generation, anime, illustration, lora, ip-adapter, flux, midjourney, stable-diffusion" mentioned.
Use when facing decisions with multiple legitimate perspectives and inherent tensions. Invoke when stakeholders have competing priorities (growth vs. sustainability, speed vs. quality, innovation vs. risk), need to pressure-test ideas from different angles before committing, exploring tradeoffs between incompatible values, synthesizing conflicting expert opinions into coherent strategy, or surfacing assumptions that single-viewpoint analysis would miss.
Comprehensive research and synthesis agent specializing in multi-source information gathering, critical analysis, and integrated knowledge synthesis. Excels at complex research projects requiring systematic investigation across domains, evidence evaluation, and coherent narrative construction.
You must use this when merging findings from multiple studies into a coherent narrative with grounded evidence.
Restructure project documentation for clarity and accessibility. Use when users ask to "organize docs", "generate documentation", "improve doc structure", "restructure README", or need to reorganize scattered documentation into a coherent structure. Analyzes project type and creates appropriate documentation hierarchy.
Strategies for managing LLM context windows effectively in AI agents. Use when building agents that handle long conversations, multi-step tasks, tool orchestration, or need to maintain coherence across extended interactions.
Multi-agent distributed context preservation protocol using cryptographic sharding, gossip propagation, and Byzantine fault tolerance to maintain coherent shared memory across dynamic agent networks.
Use when synthesizing multiple sources into coherent knowledge bases, performing multi-source analysis, or creating topic expertise from URLs and files. Also use when encountering content integration tasks requiring connections across disparate materials.
Systematic pre-publication manuscript audit producing a structured refactoring report with section-level diagnostics, citation hygiene analysis, and submission-readiness assessment. Use this skill whenever the user uploads a manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, journal submission, or conference paper and asks for review, feedback, editing, refactoring, pre-submission check, proofreading, or quality audit. Also trigger when the user says "review my paper", "check before submission", "is this ready to submit", "pre-pub checklist", "manuscript review", "refactor my paper", or asks about citation consistency, argument coherence, or formatting compliance. Covers partial requests like "check my references" or "does the abstract work" — the full diagnostic surfaces issues across all facets even when only one was asked about.
Critical analysis of research papers, academic manuscripts, preprints, and technical studies — evaluating methodology, claims-evidence alignment, contribution significance, and intellectual honesty. Produces coherent analytical responses (not checklists) that distinguish genuine weaknesses from standard field limitations. Governs intellectual posture: collegial reader, not adversarial reviewer. Triggers on: "critique this paper", "review this research", "what do you think of this paper", "analyze this study", "evaluate the methodology", "is this paper sound", "assess this research", "strengths and weaknesses of this paper", "does the evidence support the claims". Use this skill when the user provides a research paper, preprint, or technical study and asks for critical evaluation of its scientific merit, methodology, or contribution — not formatting, citation hygiene, or submission readiness (use manuscript-review for those).