Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,230 Skills
Provides general code quality and best practices guidance applicable across languages and frameworks. Focuses on linting, testing, and type safety.
Code quality improvement: review, refactoring, debugging. Phases: review feedback, systematic refactoring, root cause debugging, verification. Capabilities: SOLID/DRY compliance, code smell detection, complexity reduction, bug investigation, verification gates. Actions: review, refactor, debug, verify, validate code. Keywords: code review, refactor, debug, SOLID, DRY, code smell, bug fix, root cause, verification, technical debt, extract method, test failure, completion claim. Use when: reviewing code changes, improving code quality, fixing bugs, reducing technical debt, validating before merge/commit.
Set up formatting, linting, import sorting, type checking, and pre-commit hooks when scaffolding or starting a new project. Use this skill whenever creating a new project, initializing a repo, scaffolding an app, or when the user asks to add linting/formatting to an existing project. Triggers on: "new project", "scaffold", "init", "set up linting", "add formatter", "add pre-commit hooks", "configure biome", "configure ruff". The goal is to establish code quality tooling from day one so issues are caught incrementally, not in a painful bulk-fix later.
Code quality validation with linters, SOLID principles, DRY detection, error detection, and architecture compliance across all languages.
Improve the quality and type-safety of TypeScript/JavaScript being written or refactored — parse-don't-validate, make-illegal-states-irrepresentable, exhaustive matching, pure-function/IO separation, and public-API hygiene. Use when asked to refactor, clean up, improve, harden, or review the design/quality of code or an API. NOT for hunting bugs (that's /code-review) and NOT for vigiles's own spec/lint rules.
Systematic codebase quality scan for identifying duplication, redundancy, and improvement opportunities. Use when reviewing a repo's architecture, finding refactoring targets, or assessing code health. Triggers: "scan the repo", "find code duplication", "suggest improvements", "code quality review", "is there redundant code", "refactoring plan", "architecture review".
Automated tooling and detection patterns for JavaScript/TypeScript code quality review
Worker that checks DRY/KISS/YAGNI/architecture compliance with quantitative Code Quality Score. Validates architectural decisions via MCP Ref: (1) Optimality (2) Compliance (3) Performance. Reports issues with SEC-, PERF-, MNT-, ARCH-, BP-, OPT- prefixes.
Agent skill for analyze-code-quality - invoke with $agent-analyze-code-quality
MUST be used whenever reviewing a Dune app for code quality, maintainability, or clean code issues — before a PR review, after a feature is complete, or when the user asks for a code review. Do NOT skip linting steps. Triggers: code quality, code review, clean code, refactor, maintainability, technical debt, any type, naming, dead code, duplication, DRY, single responsibility, component size, lint, linting, TypeScript strict, dependency injection, file structure.
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.
Code quality audit worker (L3). Checks cyclomatic complexity, deep nesting, long methods, god classes, method signature quality, O(n²) algorithms, N+1 queries, magic numbers/constants. Returns findings with severity, location, effort, recommendations.