Loading...
Loading...
Found 52 Skills
Expert code refactoring specialist for improving code quality without changing behavior. Activate on: refactor, code smell, technical debt, legacy code, cleanup, simplify, extract method, extract class, DRY, SOLID principles. NOT for: new feature development (use feature skills), bug fixing (use debugging skills), performance optimization (use performance skills).
Restructures existing code to improve readability, maintainability, and performance without changing external behavior. USE WHEN: Restructuring code without changing behavior, extracting methods/classes, removing duplication, applying design patterns, improving code organization, reducing technical debt. DO NOT USE: For bug fixes (use /debugging), for adding tests (use /testing), for new features (implement directly). TRIGGERS: refactor, restructure, rewrite, clean up, simplify, extract, inline, rename, move, split, merge, decompose, modularize, decouple, technical debt, code smell, DRY, SOLID, improve code, modernize, reorganize.
Comprehensive codebase quality audit with parallel agent orchestration, GitHub issue creation, automated PR generation per issue, and PM-prioritized recommendations. Use for code review, refactoring audits, technical debt analysis, module quality assessment, or codebase health checks.
Agent skill for code-analyzer - invoke with $agent-code-analyzer
Expertise in Senior Principal Engineering refactoring. Use when you need to eliminate technical debt, remove "AI Slop," simplify complex logic, and ensure DRY code.
Modernize legacy codebases, migrate frameworks, and reduce technical debt. Use for legacy system updates or framework migrations.
Refactor codebases using Design by Typed Holes methodology - iterative, test-driven refactoring with formal hole resolution, constraint propagation, and continuous validation. Use when refactoring existing code, optimizing architecture, or consolidating technical debt through systematic hole-driven development.
The practice of restructuring and simplifying code continuously – reducing complexity, improving design, and keeping codebases clean.
Decision-making framework for software development, Y Combinator / Silicon Valley style. Based on real principles from Paul Graham, Sam Altman, Michael Seibel, Patrick Collison, and Brian Chesky. Use when: - Developing features or products - Making technical decisions (what to do, how, when) - Prioritizing work (P0, P1, P2) - Evaluating whether to refactor or patch - Deciding on technical debt - Evaluating whether to add tests, CI/CD, or automation - Any architecture or engineering decision Triggers: development, code, feature, refactor, architecture, prioritize, technical decision, what to do first, technical debt, tests, CI/CD, sprint, backlog
Executes large-scale architectural refactoring and technical debt reduction across the entire codebase. Ensures consistency with modern design patterns.
Analyzes code complexity, technical debt, and industry trends to propose a 3-month strategic roadmap. Aligns engineering effort with business ROI.
Translates engineering metrics (DORA, error rates, technical debt) into business KPIs and financial impact. Helps justify technical investments to stakeholders.