Loading...
Loading...
Found 147 Skills
Verification-ladder R5 review dimension: the mutation-adequacy adequacy backstop. Runs the diff-scoped mutation gate, reads the carrier, and turns surviving / NoCoverage mutants into concrete 'write a test that kills <file>:<line>' follow-ups. Triggers: 'mutation adequacy', 'check mutation score', or /review on a HIGH-tier feature. The mutation SCORE is advisory by default (a config override is needed to block on it). The NoCoverage axis has its own real, functioning block-mode enforcement path under review.mutationEnforcement: block (default budget: 0 uncovered changed lines) — opt-in, same as the score's severity. The diff-scoped CI wiring runs in observe mode unconditionally pending a clean runner verdict; it is not yet a blocking CI backstop. Do NOT run full-tree mutation here (scope:'full' is deferred to R10/v2.12).
Create and manage Claude Code skills following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns, file paths, content patterns), enforcement levels (block, suggest, warn), hook mechanisms (UserPromptSubmit, PreToolUse), session tracking, and the 500-line rule.
Architecture validation and patterns for clean architecture, backend structure enforcement, project structure validation, test standards, and context-aware sizing. Use when designing system boundaries, enforcing layered architecture, validating project structure, defining test standards, or choosing the right architecture tier for project scope.
PUA Loop — Autonomous Iterative Development with PUA Pressure. Runs continuously until the task is completed, no user interaction required. Combines the Ralph Loop iteration mechanism with PUA quality enforcement. Triggered by: '/pua loop', '/pua:loop', 'automatic loop', 'loop mode', 'keep running', 'automatic iteration'.
Test-driven development workflow enforcement for Python and React projects. Use when the user requests TDD, test-first development, or red-green-refactor methodology. Enforces strict cycle: write ONE failing test -> implement minimum code to pass -> refactor while green -> repeat. Applies to both backend (pytest) and frontend (Testing Library). Changes agent behavior to write tests before code. Does NOT provide testing patterns (use pytest-patterns or react-testing-patterns for how to write tests).
Senior specialist in Supabase SSR, RLS Enforcement, and Next.js 16.1+ architecture. Use when designing database schemas, auth flows, or real-time syncing in 2026.
Executable documentation governance with compound engineering and abductive learning. Enforces the Seven Laws through type compilation, schema validation, and hookify-based enforcement. Implements programmatic compound engineering where K' = K ∪ crystallize(assess(τ)) for monotonic knowledge growth. Integrates abstracted abductive learning (OHPT protocol) for systematic debugging and pattern extraction. Trigger when writing code, debugging, establishing governance, or when mentioned vibecode, compound, abductive, or executable documentation. Self-validating and homoiconic.
TDD enforcement during implementation. Reads `tdd:` setting from CLAUDE.md. Modes - strict (human approval for escape), soft (warnings), off (disabled). Auto-invoked by /implement.
Validate specifications, implementations, constitution compliance, or understanding. Includes spec quality checks, drift detection, and constitution enforcement.
How to work in an OKF starter project (the `okf` starter pack): a knowledge base that is conformant with Google's Open Knowledge Format (OKF) from commit one — `concepts/`, `references/`, `notes/`, a reserved `index.md` navigation hub, and a reserved `log.md` change history. Read when the project has these folders plus reserved files, OR when asked whether a document is OKF-conformant, or to add a document to an OKF knowledge base. Carries the OKF conventions (non-empty `type` on every non-reserved doc; reserved files carry no frontmatter) as guidance, not enforcement. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.
Database security auditor specialized in Row Level Security (RLS) enforcement, Zero-Trust database architecture, and forensic audit trails. Covers Supabase RLS policies, Postgres security, Convex auth guards, PGAudit configuration, JIT access controls, and database-specific compliance validation. Use when auditing database access policies, implementing RLS in Supabase or Postgres, configuring Convex auth guards, setting up audit logging, reviewing database security, or validating database-level compliance requirements.
Define the operational guardrails that stop end customers from gaming a refer-a-friend program - reward caps, velocity limits and cooldowns, reward-hold windows tied to the refund window, eligibility rules, identity-verification gates, a published enforcement ladder, and abuse-monitoring signals. Produces a guardrail spec for B2C and B2B SaaS referral program managers. Use whenever the user mentions referral abuse, self-referral, fake accounts claiming referral rewards, referral rings, or a referral code leaking to coupon forums, even if they never say abuse. Do NOT use for professional-affiliate traffic fraud - use mbfinotti/partnerships-skills@affiliate-fraud-detection instead.