Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,264 Skills
Verify your own completed code changes using the repo's existing infrastructure and an independent evaluator context. Use after implementing a change when you need to run unit or integration tests, check build or lint gates, prove the real surface works with evidence, and challenge the changed code for clarity, deduplication, and maintainability. If the repo is not verifiable yet, hand off to `agent-readiness`; if you are reviewing someone else's code, use `review`.
Use after receiving code review feedback and before implementing suggestions, especially when feedback is unclear or technically questionable—requires technical rigor and verification, not perfunctory agreement or blind execution
Comprehensive fullstack development skill for building complete web applications with React, Next.js, Node.js, GraphQL, and PostgreSQL. Includes project scaffolding, code quality analysis, architecture patterns, and complete tech stack guidance. Use when building new projects, analyzing code quality, implementing design patterns, or setting up development workflows.
Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.
Code refactoring patterns and techniques for improving code quality without changing behavior. Use for cleaning up legacy code, reducing complexity, or improving maintainability.
Fullstack development toolkit with project scaffolding for Next.js/FastAPI/MERN/Django stacks and code quality analysis. Use when scaffolding new projects, analyzing codebase quality, or implementing fullstack architecture patterns.
TypeScript standards and best practices with modern tooling. Use when working with TypeScript or TypeScript React files.
Systematically trace bugs backward through call stack to find original trigger. Use when errors occur deep in execution and you need to trace back to find the original trigger.
Provides refactoring recommendations and step-by-step improvement plans. Use when planning refactoring, improving code structure, or reducing technical debt.
Technical solution evaluation and code review in the style of Linus Torvalds. Only use this when the user explicitly requests a Linus-style review or explicitly asks for a rigorous evaluation of code changes/technical solutions (e.g., "review changes/code", "evaluate if the solution is appropriate", "check submission standards", "linus-tech-review").
Provides structured code review with prioritized feedback. Use when reviewing PRs, analyzing code quality, checking for bugs, or auditing changes. Triggers on "review this", "check this code", PR reviews, or code quality questions.
智能代码重构，提供设计模式建议、代码异味检测和保持行为不变的安全转换策略。