Loading...
Loading...
Found 583 Skills
General code quality and engineering discipline. Use on any code task to enforce minimal, clean, production-grade changes. Follow these rules when writing, editing, or reviewing code. Activates on: code, implement, fix, build, refactor, feature, bug, change, modify, add, create, develop, write, edit, improve, optimize, update, remove, delete, rename, move, extract, inline, migrate, convert, replace, rewrite.
Summarize current work, commit, push, and create or update a PR. Automatically write conversation context into the PR description to ensure reviewers can quickly understand the background.
When the user asks to fix, address, or work on PR review comments — fetch review comments from a GitHub pull request and apply fixes to the local codebase. Requires gh CLI.
Generate a handoff document after implementation work is complete — summarizes changes, risks, and review focus areas for the review pipeline. Use when done coding and ready to hand off for review.
Reads open review comments from a GitHub PR, triages them, applies code fixes, and drafts reply messages. Use when user wants to address PR comments, says 'address review comments', 'fix PR feedback', 'handle PR comments', 'respond to review', or mentions addressing code review feedback on a pull request.
Use when the user says "/plan-execute", "plan execute", "implement plan", or "execute plan" and provides a finalized plan file path to carry out. Claude orchestrates, Codex writes code, Claude reviews, and Codex fixes issues until the quality bar is met.
Start the diffity diff viewer server for the current working tree or staged changes
Pull all file comments from the current GitHub pull request and address them by making code changes.
Deterministic 3-phase GitHub PR review comment extraction: Authenticate, Mine, Validate. Use when mining tribal knowledge from PR reviews, extracting coding standards from review history, or building datasets for the Code Archaeologist agent. Use for "mine PRs", "extract review comments", "tribal knowledge", or "PR review history". Do NOT use for analyzing patterns, generating rules, or interpreting comments — that is the Code Archaeologist agent's responsibility.
WordPress performance code review and optimization analysis. Use when reviewing WordPress PHP code for performance issues, auditing themes/plugins for scalability, optimizing WP_Query, analyzing caching strategies, checking code before launch, or detecting anti-patterns, or when user mentions "performance review", "optimization audit", "slow WordPress", "slow queries", "high-traffic", "scale WordPress", "code review", "timeout", "500 error", "out of memory", or "site won't load". Detects anti-patterns in database queries, hooks, object caching, AJAX, and template loading.
Reviews codebases, architectures, PRs, and technical plans for vanity engineering — code and systems built for the developer's ego, resume, or intellectual pleasure rather than delivering user or business value. Triggers on: "review this code", "is this over-engineered", "code review", "architecture review", "complexity audit", "vanity check", "is this necessary", "simplify this", "tech debt review", or any request to evaluate whether code or architecture is justified by actual requirements. Also trigger when the user shares a codebase and asks for feedback, when discussing framework/library choices, when reviewing PRs, or when someone is debating whether to refactor or rebuild. Nudge activation when you detect patterns of unnecessary abstraction, premature optimization, or resume-driven technology choices in code the user shares — even if they haven't asked for a vanity review.
Enforces Intent UI component library conventions. Use when writing React components, reviewing UI code, or building pages/features that involve UI elements. Ensures semantic color tokens, proper icon usage, correct form patterns, and that existing components from src/components/ui/ are used.