Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,263 Skills
Emulate supported AI code-review GitHub Actions locally and print a terminal-only review from portable skill instructions. Use when running /review-action or checking local PR-review feedback before publishing.
AFK adversarial code-review loop: Cursor agent CLI critic (grug + thermo-nuclear) produces structured findings; Codex validator confirms or pushbacks on regression risk; parent adjudicates and commits fixes per finding until clean. Config at ~/.config/adversarial-review/config.toml. Use for adversarial review, clean code loop, or unattended branch hardening.
Update Knowledge Base — Execute doc-updater, code-reviewer, and learn-eval in sequence to solidify the changes from this session into documents and knowledge.
Detect AI-generated code patterns ("slop") in PHP/Laravel and TypeScript/React source — comment narration, generic naming, premature interfaces, defensive overdose, mock-everything tests, and the absence of human "scars". Use when reviewing AI-assisted PRs, auditing code for taste/quality (not metrics — that's technical-debt), or hardening a code-review checklist. Triggers on "review for AI slop", "find AI patterns", "check code feels human", "audit code-quality taste".
Synthesize a recurring code-review rule into a custom lint rule — gated by an independent soundness test that abstains rather than ship a checker it can't prove sound
Review or re-review a PR by number in an isolated worktree. Runs the `om-code-review` skill — or, for spec-only design PRs, a specification review — submits approve/request-changes, manages pipeline labels. On changes-requested, the autofix loop (fix/test/validate/re-review until merge-ready) runs on the automation's own PRs or with --autofix; other authors' PRs get review + handoff only. Usage - /om-auto-review-pr <PR-number> [--autofix]
Code-reviews Pluggy API integrations against Pluggy's official documentation (queried in real time via the Pluggy MCP, with a web fallback to docs.pluggy.ai when the MCP isn't connected) and returns a diagnostic report (✅/❌/⚠️) with file, line, and the code fix for each issue. Use WHENEVER the dev uploads integration files and asks to review, analyze, diagnose, or validate their Pluggy integration — or says things like "review my integration", "check my Pluggy code", "is this ready for production?", "Pluggy Doctor", "check my webhooks", "is my integration secure?", or the Portuguese variants "analisa minha integração", "revisa meu código da Pluggy", "tá tudo certo pra ir pra produção?", "checa meus webhooks", "minha integração tá segura?". Also trigger when the dev pastes/uploads code that clearly calls the Pluggy API (connect_token, GET /items, item/created webhooks, clientUserId, etc.) and wants to know if it's correct, even without saying "Pluggy Doctor". This skill is for REVIEWING existing code, not writing an integration from scratch.
Personalized 1-on-1 AI tutor using Bloom's 2-Sigma mastery learning. Guides users through any topic with Socratic questioning, adaptive pacing, and rich visual output (HTML dashboards, Excalidraw concept maps, generated images). Use when user wants to learn something, study a topic, understand a concept, requests tutoring, says 'teach me', 'I want to learn', 'explain X to me step by step', 'help me understand', or invokes /sigma. Triggers on: learn, study, teach, tutor, understand, master, explain step by step.
Create high-quality, production-grade skills for Claude Code. Expert guidance on skill architecture, workflow design, prompt engineering, and packaging. Use when user wants to create a new skill, build a skill, design a skill, write a skill, update an existing skill, improve a skill, refactor a skill, debug a skill, or package a skill. Triggers: 'create skill', 'build skill', 'new skill', 'skill creation', 'write a skill', 'make a skill', 'design a skill', 'improve skill', 'package skill', 'skill development', 'skill template', 'skill best practices', 'write SKILL.md'.
Review the README or a documentation page from several real reader points of view at once. Fans out one parallel reviewer per audience — Claude Code newcomer, power user, plugin/skill author, skeptical senior engineer, non-running decision-maker — each scoring it x/5 and naming concrete, line-level fixes. Use when asked to review, critique, grade, or "get to N/5" the README or any front-door doc, or to check how a doc reads for real users. Not for code review (use /code-review for that).
Devil's Advocate stress-testing for code, architecture, PRs, and decisions. Surfaces hidden flaws through structured adversarial analysis with metacognitive depth. Use for high-stakes review, stress-testing choices, or when the user wants problems found deliberately. NOT for routine code review (use engineering:code-review). Triggers on "스트레스 테스트", "stress test", "devil's advocate", "반론", "이거 괜찮아", "문제 없을까", "깊은 리뷰", "critical review", "adversarial".
This skill should be used for structured feature development with codebase understanding. Triggers on /do command. Provides a 5-phase workflow (Understand, Clarify, Design, Implement, Complete) using codeagent-wrapper to orchestrate code-explorer, code-architect, code-reviewer, and develop agents in parallel.