Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,194 Skills
Applies a modified Fagan Inspection methodology to systematically resolve persistent bugs and complex issues. Use when multiple previous fix attempts have failed repeatedly, when dealing with intricate system interactions, or when a methodical root cause analysis is needed. Do not use for simple troubleshooting. Triggers after multiple failed debugging attempts on the same complex issue.
Architecture analysis, violation detection, and pattern validation. USE WHEN: reviewing code architecture, identifying violations, verifying patterns, updating technical documentation. Reference: docs/02-architecture/ARCHITECTURE.md Examples: <example> Context: User wants to check if code follows architecture. user: "Analyze if the payment module follows our architecture" assistant: "I'll use architecture-analyzer to review against ARCHITECTURE.md." <commentary>Architectural review is architecture-analyzer specialty.</commentary> </example> <example> Context: Need to identify technical debt. user: "Find architectural violations in the services layer" assistant: "I'll use architecture-analyzer to scan for violations." <commentary>Violation detection is architecture-analyzer responsibility.</commentary> </example>
TypeScript, React, and Node.js coding standards: naming, types, hooks, components, error handling, refactoring, code review. Use when creating/editing TS/JS/React files, naming variables or components, designing API endpoints, handling async, structuring components, or when the user asks "how should I name...", "what's the best way to...", "is this good practice...", "can you review this code". Keywords: TypeScript, React, hooks, React Query, Jest, RTL, naming, immutability. Do not load for: CSS-only changes, documentation writing, JSON config edits, shell scripts.
This skill should be used when the user asks to review, refactor, debug, or optimize Vue 3 code for performance, correctness, SSR hydration, reactivity stability, request concurrency, TypeScript safety, or bundle size.
Generate production-ready Greptile AI code review configuration for any repository. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Greptile, AI code review setup, PR review configuration, automated code review rules, or wants to set up .greptile/ config files. Also trigger when someone says "set up code review", "configure PR reviews", "add review rules", or asks about Greptile configuration — even if they don't say "Greptile" explicitly but describe wanting AI-powered PR review automation. This skill analyzes the actual repository structure and produces tailored config, not generic boilerplate.
Comprehensive code review criteria covering correctness, readability, maintainability, security, performance, and testing. Reference when reviewing code changes or preparing code for review.
Use when reviewing Rust code for craft quality, when writing new Rust code that should follow professional patterns, or when the user asks to judge, audit, or improve Rust code against best practices. Covers type design, function signatures, trait architecture, error handling, visibility, macros, testing, and performance patterns.
Audit rapidly generated or AI-produced code for structural flaws, fragility, and production risks.
Multi-layer quality assurance with 5-layer verification pyramid (Rules → Functional → Visual → Integration → Quality Scoring). Independent verification with LLM-as-judge and Agent-as-a-Judge patterns. Score 0-100 with ≥90 threshold. Use when verifying code quality, security scanning, preventing test gaming, comprehensive QA, or ensuring production readiness through multi-layer validation.
Lead complex software implementation, architecture decisions, and reliable delivery across any modern technology stack. Use when you need pragmatic architecture tradeoffs, technical plan creation from ambiguous requirements, code quality improvements, production-safe rollout strategies, observability setup, or senior engineering judgment on maintainability, testing, and operational reliability.
Library-agnostic Flutter/Dart code review checklist covering widget best practices, state management patterns (BLoC, Riverpod, Provider, GetX, MobX, Signals), Dart idioms, performance, accessibility, security, and clean architecture.
Run a full Dune app platform review against a React/TypeScript CDF codebase, following the cognitedata/dune-app-reviews scoring criteria. Produces three artifacts: review-files.md (per-file inventory), review-packages.md (dependency audit), and review-report.md (scored report with must/should/nice-fix items). Use when the user asks for a Dune app review, pre-submit review, approval review, app certification review, code quality audit, CDF platform review, or "run dune-review" on a codebase before submission.