Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,140 Skills
Evaluates and prevents unnecessary abstractions by analyzing interfaces, layers, and patterns against concrete requirements. Use when evaluating new abstractions, reviewing architecture proposals, detecting over-engineering, or simplifying existing code. Triggers on "is this abstraction necessary", "too many layers", "simplify architecture", "reduce complexity", "over-engineered", "do we need this interface", or when reviewing design patterns.
Evaluate third-party agent skills for security risks before adoption or update. Use when: (1) Installing or updating a skill from skills.sh, ClawHub, or any public registry, (2) Auditing skills for security risks or reviewing PRs that add/update skill dependencies, (3) Building a team/org allowlist of approved skills, (4) Investigating suspicious skill behavior or answering "is this skill safe?" / "should we adopt this skill?"
Use only when the user explicitly requests brainstorming, evaluating architecture choices, or comparing options where no single concern dominates
Code quality gatekeeper and auditor. Enforces strict quality gates, resolves the AI verification gap, and evaluates codebases across 12 critical dimensions with evidence-based scoring. Use when auditing code quality, reviewing AI-generated code, scoring codebases against industry standards, or enforcing pre-commit quality gates. Use for quality audit, code review, codebase evaluation, security assessment, technical debt analysis.
Real DCF (Discounted Cash Flow) model creation for equity valuation. Retrieves financial data from SEC filings and analyst reports, builds comprehensive cash flow projections with proper WACC calculations, performs sensitivity analysis, and outputs professional Excel models with executive summaries. Use when users need to value a company using DCF methodology, request intrinsic value analysis, or ask for detailed financial modeling with growth projections and terminal value calculations.
Learn how to extend Dart's functionality to implement JavaScript-style "truthy" checks for easier conditional logic and value evaluations.
Company HR specialist providing expert guidance on job descriptions, interview processes, candidate evaluation, onboarding, performance management, and HR policies. Use when working on human resources tasks and people operations.
Evaluates RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) pipeline quality across retrieval and generation stages. Measures precision, recall, MRR for retrieval; groundedness, completeness, and hallucination rate for generation. Diagnoses failure root causes and recommends chunk, retrieval, and prompt improvements. Triggers on: "audit RAG", "RAG quality", "evaluate retrieval", "hallucination detection", "retrieval precision", "why is RAG failing", "RAG diagnosis", "retrieval quality", "RAG evaluation", "chunk quality", "RAG pipeline review", "grounding check". Use this skill when diagnosing or evaluating a RAG pipeline's quality.
Markets orchestration — connects ESPN live schedules with Kalshi & Polymarket prediction markets. Unified dashboards, odds comparison, entity search, and bet evaluation across platforms. Use when: user wants to see prediction market odds alongside ESPN game schedules, compare odds across platforms, search for a team/player on Kalshi or Polymarket, check for arbitrage between ESPN odds and prediction markets, or evaluate a specific game's market value. Don't use when: user wants raw prediction market data without ESPN context — use polymarket or kalshi directly. For pure odds math (conversion, de-vigging, Kelly) — use betting. For live scores without market data — use the sport-specific skill.
Fetch, organize, and analyze LangSmith traces for debugging and evaluation. Use when you need to: query traces/runs by project, metadata, status, or time window; download traces to JSON; organize outcomes into passed/failed/error buckets; analyze token/message/tool-call patterns; compare passed vs failed behavior; or investigate benchmark and production failures.
Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.
Launch a sub-agent judge to evaluate results produced in the current conversation