Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,194 Skills
Technical debt detection and remediation. Run at session end to find duplicated code, dead imports, security issues, and complexity hotspots. Triggers: 'find tech debt', 'scan for issues', 'check code quality', 'wrap up session', 'ready to commit', 'before merge', 'code review prep'. Always uses parallel subagents for fast analysis.
Research-driven code review and validation at multiple levels of abstraction. Two modes: (1) Session review — after making changes, review and verify work using parallel reviewers that research-validate every assumption; (2) Full codebase audit — deep end-to-end evaluation using parallel teams of subagent-spawning reviewers. Use when reviewing changes, verifying work quality, auditing a codebase, validating correctness, checking assumptions, finding defects, reducing complexity. NOT for writing new code, explaining code, or benchmarking.
一个全面、结构化的特性开发工作流程，包含代码库探索、架构设计、质量审查和实现等专门阶段。在构建需要以下条件的新特性时使用：（1）在做出更改之前了解现有代码库，（2）通过系统性的提问澄清模糊的需求，（3）在实现之前设计周到的架构，（4）通过多维度的代码审查确保质量。非常适合涉及多个文件、需要架构决策、包含复杂集成或需求有些不明确的功能特性。
Requires detailed type annotations for all Python functions, methods, and class members.
Review Prisma code for common violations, security issues, and performance anti-patterns found in AI coding agent stress testing. Use when reviewing Prisma Client usage, database operations, or performing code reviews on projects using Prisma ORM.
Review code changes in a feature branch before merging. Use when asked to review a branch, review changes, check a PR, or audit code before merge. Compares the current branch against the default branch (main/master) and categorizes issues by severity (Critical, Major, Minor) with actionable solutions.
Comprehensive .NET exception handling quality improvement workflow. Auto-detects .NET projects, investigates 10 common exception handling mistakes, generates prioritized findings, and orchestrates fixes following best practices.
Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis
Three-stage code review protocol: spec compliance, code quality, and domain integrity. Activate when reviewing code, preparing PRs, assessing implementation quality, or checking that code matches requirements. Triggers on: "review this code", "prepare PR", "check implementation", "code quality", "does this match the spec".
Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.
Write readable, maintainable code through disciplined naming, small functions, and clean error handling. Use when the user mentions "code review", "naming conventions", "function too long", "code smells", or "readable code". Covers SRP, comment discipline, formatting, and unit testing. For refactoring techniques, see refactoring-patterns. For architecture, see clean-architecture.
Applies a modified Fagan Inspection methodology to systematically resolve persistent bugs and complex issues. Use when multiple previous fix attempts have failed repeatedly, when dealing with intricate system interactions, or when a methodical root cause analysis is needed. Do not use for simple troubleshooting. Triggers after multiple failed debugging attempts on the same complex issue.