Loading...
Loading...
Found 3,074 Skills
Conduct targeted code exploration on a repository, and document the process of "Asking Questions → Reading Code → Reaching Conclusions" as searchable evidence for direct reuse when similar questions arise next time. There are three types: question (investigate code around a specific problem and provide conclusions), module-overview (organize the structure, boundaries, entry points, and dependencies of a module), spike (conduct lightweight technical exploration of multiple possible directions without making final decisions). Trigger scenarios: When users say "Let's explore first", "How is X implemented in this repository", "Quickly get familiar with this module", "Archive the exploration results". For the distinction from learning / tricks / decisions, refer to the root skill `easysdd`.
Draft or update requirement documents under `easysdd/requirements/` for the project — describe a capability's "reason for existence, solution approach, and boundaries" using **user stories + plain language**, so non-technical readers can quickly grasp the key highlights of the system. Layered with architecture: requirement is the "problem space" (why this capability is needed), while architecture is the "solution space" (what structure is used to implement it). Two modes: new (draft a new requirement doc from scratch), update (refresh an existing doc based on new materials or implementation changes). Single-target rule — only modify one document at a time. Trigger scenarios: when the user says "fill in a requirement doc", "write down the requirements for this capability", "update the requirements directory", or when it is found during the feature-design phase that there is no corresponding requirement for the capability to be implemented this time.
Exhaustively extract UX patterns from a reference web app. Walks every screen, captures screenshots of every state, records interaction patterns, copy verbatim, keyboard shortcuts, responsive treatments, motion, and empty/error/loading states. Produces a reusable pattern library that other audits can compare against. The inverse of ux-audit — asks 'what is the bar?' rather than 'does this match the bar?'. Trigger with 'learn from X', 'extract patterns from X', 'study X's UX', 'reverse engineer the UX of X', 'build a pattern library from X'.
Follow this sub-process when fixing bugs — turn the verbal description of "problem found" into a closed loop from verification to repair, leaving three documents: problem report, root cause analysis, and repair record. This process adds a buffer between "seeing the problem" and "starting to modify code" to avoid common pitfalls: the problem description in your mind disappears after the fix, you only fix the surface without analyzing the root cause, the scope of repair expands and cannot be traced, and you don't know if the fix is correct without verification after modification. This skill only acts as a router, deciding which of report / analyze / fix to proceed with based on existing artifacts. For simple problems that can be identified at a glance, a fast track will be taken, skipping the two middle steps and only retaining the fix-note.
YC Office Hours — two modes. Startup mode: six forcing questions that expose demand reality, status quo, desperate specificity, narrowest wedge, observation, and future-fit. Builder mode: design thinking brainstorming for side projects, hackathons, learning, and open source. Saves a design doc. Use when asked to "brainstorm this", "I have an idea", "help me think through this", "office hours", or "is this worth building". Proactively suggest when the user describes a new product idea or is exploring whether something is worth building — before any code is written. Use before /plan-ceo-review or /plan-eng-review.
Clear description of what this skill does and when to use it. Use when the user asks about X or wants to work with Y. Include specific trigger phrases so agents auto-load it correctly. Max 1024 characters.
Generate a phase-based task breakdown in tasks.md from spec.md and plan.md
Create, update, validate, or analyze a PRD. Use when the user wants help producing, editing, validating, or analyzing a PRD.
Automatically persists every plan produced by the agent as a structured Markdown file under .agentic/plans/ with a datestamped slug and updates the plans index. Prevents PLAN.md from being accidentally committed to the repository. Invoked automatically at the end of any planning session — no user prompt required. Triggered whenever an agent completes a plan, proposes a multi-step approach, or produces an architectural decision.
Generate a stakeholder update tailored to audience and cadence. Use when writing a weekly or monthly status for leadership, announcing a launch, escalating a risk or blocker, or translating the same progress into exec-brief, engineering-detail, or customer-facing versions.
agent-team: Cancel a non-terminal task with a reason.
Guides senior system and solution architecture—cross-service boundaries, integration patterns, non-functional requirements (scale, reliability, security, cost), ADRs, C4-style modeling, architecture review, build-vs-buy, and phased migration (strangler, dual-write). Use when designing multi-service systems, evaluating platform or vendor choices, writing or reviewing architecture decision records, defining standards and principles, or assessing technical risk across domains—not for single-service RFCs and module design (senior-software-engineer), data platform or mesh decisions (data-architect), cloud landing zone, Well-Architected, and migration architecture (cloud-architect), cloud/IaC implementation (infrastructure-engineer, cloud-engineer), internal developer platform product (platform-engineer), or program tracking (technical-program-manager). For business strategy and cases, use business-consultant; for applied AI (RAG, agents, copilots), use applied-ai-architect-commercial-enterprise.