Loading...
Loading...
Found 2,893 Skills
This skill should be used when a team wants to create or refine the technical guidelines document — for example "create the tech steering doc", "document our tech stack", "write the technical guidelines", "document our architecture decisions", "set up the tech steering", or "update the tech doc". Generates docs/steering/TECH.md as a living document capturing the stack, architecture patterns, constraints, commands, and ADRs. Generated once and refined — not regenerated from scratch.
[Pragmatic DDD Architecture] Interactive guide for scaffolding and bootstrapping a new project or module from scratch. Use this skill when the user asks to start a new project or add a massive new feature. It instructs the agent to run an assessment wizard, define the PRD, evaluate serverless tech, and set up the foundation.
Write clear, plain English patient communications for any healthcare context. Use when asked to write a patient letter, patient information leaflet, appointment letter, test results letter, discharge summary for patients, or health education content. Targets accessible reading level with clear next steps.
Onboard a new repository or a repository with scattered documents into the easysdd system. Two paths are automatically determined: the empty repository path (no spec-like documents or easysdd/ directory in the repository) builds the skeleton from scratch; the migration path (the repository already has scattered documents or partial easysdd/ structure) first generates an audit report + migration mapping plan, which is confirmed by the user one by one before implementation. This skill only does two things: "build the skeleton" and "organize existing documents". After the skeleton is built, all sub-workflows can run directly. Trigger scenarios: the user says "Use easysdd in this project", "Build easysdd structure", "Initialize easysdd", "Migrate to easysdd".
Create, amend, or backprop bugs into SPEC.md at repo root. Sole mutator of the project spec. Triggers when the user asks to write a spec, start a new spec, distill a spec from existing code, add invariants, amend sections (§G, §C, §I, §V, §T, §B), or record a bug via backprop. Common phrasings: "write the spec for...", "new spec", "bug: ...", "amend §V.3", "distill spec from code", "spec this idea". Reads and follows FORMAT.md for the caveman encoding rules and pipe-table shape of §T and §B.
Write the full patent specification from claims and invention disclosure. Use when user says "撰写说明书", "write specification", "写说明书", "patent description", or wants to draft the complete patent specification.
One-stop skill for the project architecture center — draft new architecture documents, refresh existing architecture documents, or conduct an architecture health check. Automatically determine the mode based on user input: `new` (draft)/ `update` (refresh to the latest code status)/ `check` (view only, generate issue list). The `check` mode has three sub-goals: consistency within a single feature design, alignment between design and code, and consistency among multiple documents under `easysdd/architecture/`. Single-target rule — only modify one document or check one target at a time. Trigger scenarios: User says "fill in an architecture doc", "draft an architecture document", "refresh the architecture directory", "write down the structure of this module", "conduct an architecture check", "is the design internally consistent?", "does the plan match the code?", "are there conflicts among several documents in the architecture folder?", or when it is found in the feature-design / feature-acceptance / implement phase that an architecture action needs to be performed first before proceeding.
Scan a Cargo workspace or package monorepo and refresh per-member `CLAUDE.md` files plus a thin root `CLAUDE.md`. User-only maintenance workflow for keeping workspace-local AI context accurate after refactors, member additions, export changes, or major architectural shifts.
When developing new features, follow this sub-process — take the vague idea of "add X capability" through to the acceptance closure, with solution documents archived so that both AI and users can later check the original thinking and decision rationale. Trigger scenarios are focused on adding new capabilities ("develop new feature", "add X", "implement XX"), and do not handle bugs in existing code. This skill only acts as a router, deciding which sub-skill to trigger next among brainstorm / design / fastforward / implement / acceptance based on existing artifacts.
Document the pitfalls encountered or good practices discovered during this work into searchable learning documents, which can be accessed by both AI and humans when similar tasks arise in the future. Two tracks: The pitfall track records experiences where "things should have worked but didn't" — including bugs, configuration traps, environment issues, and integration failures; The knowledge track records findings that "should be the default approach going forward" — including best practices, workflow improvements, and reusable patterns. Trigger scenarios: Proactively prompt at the end of feature-acceptance or issue-fix workflows, or when the user mentions phrases like "document knowledge", "learning", "document learnings", or "record this experience". Spec documents record what was done, while learning documents record what pitfalls were encountered / what was learned — they complement each other and are not interchangeable.
One-stop skill for the project architecture center — draft new architecture documents, refresh existing ones, or conduct an architecture health check. Automatically determine the mode based on user input: `new` (draft)/ `update` (refresh to latest code status)/ `check` (review without modification, generate issue list). The `check` mode has three sub-objectives: consistency within a single feature design, alignment between design and code, and consistency among multiple documents under `codestable/architecture/`. Single-target rule — only modify one document or check one target at a time. Trigger scenarios: User says "fill in an architecture doc", "draft an architecture document", "refresh the architecture directory", "write down this module structure", "conduct an architecture check", "is the design internally consistent?", "does the plan match the code?", "are there conflicts among several documents in the architecture folder?", or when an architecture action is required before proceeding during the feature-design / feature-acceptance / implement phases.
Document the finalized tech stack selections, architecture decisions, long-term constraints, and coding conventions in the project into searchable permanent records. No one will remember why X was chosen six months later, but with decision documents, at least the background can be understood before making changes next time. Four categories: tech-stack (which tools/libraries/frameworks to use), architecture (how the system is organized), constraint (what is not allowed), convention (what is uniformly done). Trigger scenarios: Proactively trigger after making important choices during feature-design or issue-analyze, or when the user says "record the decision", "archive tech selection", "ADR", "record this constraint", "write down the convention". Only archive finalized decisions; do not archive proposed solutions under discussion.