Loading...
Loading...
Found 245 Skills
Use when you need to apply data-oriented programming best practices in Java — including separating code (behavior) from data structures using records, designing immutable data with pure transformation functions, keeping data flat and denormalized with ID-based references, starting with generic data structures converting to specific types when needed, ensuring data integrity through pure validation functions, and creating flexible generic data access layers. Part of the skills-for-java project
Review, design, and refactor TensorRT-LLM PyTorch MoE code for architecture fit, clean code, maintainability, and testability. Always use for any modification, review, refactor, or design planning that touches MoE modules, including tensorrt_llm/_torch/modules/fused_moe, ConfigurableMoE, MoE backends, MoEScheduler/moe_scheduler.py, forward execution/chunking, communication strategies, EPLB, quantization/weight handling, routing, factories, MoE docs, or MoE tests. Also use when the user asks whether a MoE design follows the current architecture or whether a MoE refactor is reasonable.
For use when students **have completed WG-12 to WG-21** (single-file consolidation blueprint) and are working on **WG-22 Code Splitting** (`agent_core.py` + `main.py`). **First message in a new session**: Display PEAS brand screen and confirm readiness first; after confirmation, **lay out the context** before proceeding to requirement clarification. If **`prompts/` or `templates/`** are missing, copy them from `references/project_assets/` to the project root. Process: Spec Alignment (2d′) → Six-column Contract → **In-session Handoff Implementation** → Acceptance. Starting point: starter_main_wg21.py; Standard reference: reference_agent_core.py + reference_main.py. Triggers: peas-workshop-advanced-coach, PEAS workshop advanced coach, WG-22, code splitting coach, Agent.chat.
Detects anemic domain models, validates and refactors them into rich domain models, and enforces tactical DDD patterns (Entities, Value Objects, Aggregates, Domain Services, Domain Events). Use when the user asks to validate, review, or check domain models or DDD code; detect anemia; refactor domain objects; improve encapsulation; or mentions terms like "anemic model", "rich domain", "aggregate", "value object", "domain event", "ubiquitous language", "is this good DDD", "does this follow DDD", or "check my domain". Do NOT use for module or service boundary design, architectural decomposition, strategic DDD context mapping, or code outside the domain layer (DTOs, controllers, infrastructure adapters).
Keep cyclomatic complexity low; flatten control flow, extract helpers, and prefer table-driven/strategy patterns over large switches