Loading...
Loading...
Found 636 Skills
Systematic code refactoring following Martin Fowler's catalog. Methodologies: characterization tests, Red-Green-Refactor, incremental transformation. Capabilities: SOLID compliance, DRY cleanup, code smell detection, complexity reduction, legacy modernization, design patterns, functional programming patterns. Actions: refactor, extract, inline, rename, move, simplify code. Keywords: refactor, SOLID, DRY, code smell, complexity, extract method, inline, rename, move, clean code, technical debt, legacy code, design pattern, characterization test, Red-Green-Refactor, functional programming, higher-order function, immutability, pure function, composition, currying, side effects. Use when: improving code quality, reducing technical debt, applying SOLID principles, fixing DRY violations, removing code smells, modernizing legacy code, applying design patterns.
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Practices: receiving feedback, requesting reviews, verification gates. Capabilities: technical evaluation, evidence-based claims, PR review, subagent-driven review, completion verification. Actions: review, evaluate, verify, validate code changes. Keywords: code review, PR review, pull request, technical feedback, review feedback, completion claim, verification, evidence-based, code quality, review request, technical rigor, subagent review, code-reviewer, review gate, merge criteria. Use when: receiving code review feedback, completing major features, making completion claims, requesting systematic reviews, validating before merge, preventing false completion claims.
Use when reviewing Rust code for craft quality, when writing new Rust code that should follow professional patterns, or when the user asks to judge, audit, or improve Rust code against best practices. Covers type design, function signatures, trait architecture, error handling, visibility, macros, testing, and performance patterns.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "remove AI slop", "clean up AI code", "remove AI patterns", "fix AI-generated code", "clean up PR", "remove unnecessary comments", "fix defensive checks", or mentions AI slop, AI code cleanup, or code quality issues from AI-assisted development. Identifies and removes unnecessary comments, defensive checks, type casts to any, and style inconsistencies.
Comprehensive review of local uncommitted changes using specialized agents with code improvement suggestions
Sets up code formatting rules and style guidelines in CLAUDE.md
Create markdown-based behavioral rules preventing unwanted actions. create hookify rule, behavioral rule, prevent behavior, block command Use when: preventing dangerous commands, blocking debug commits, enforcing conventions DO NOT use when: hook scope (abstract:hook-scope-guide), SDK hooks (abstract:hook-authoring), evaluating hooks (abstract:hooks-eval).
Auto-fix CodeRabbit review comments - get CodeRabbit review comments from GitHub and fix them interactively or in batch
Prepare R packages for CRAN submission by checking for common ad-hoc requirements not caught by devtools::check(). Use when: (1) Preparing a package for first CRAN release, (2) Preparing a package update for CRAN resubmission, (3) Reviewing a package to ensure CRAN compliance, (4) Responding to CRAN reviewer feedback. Covers documentation requirements, DESCRIPTION field standards, URL validation, examples, and administrative requirements.
Adversarial code review using the opposite model. Spawns 1–3 reviewers on the opposing model (Claude spawns Codex, Codex spawns Claude) to challenge work from distinct critical lenses. Triggers: "adversarial review".
Comprehensive code investigation and audit tool. Discovers all project features, then dispatches parallel subagents to analyze issues, risks, dead code, missing functionality, and redundancies. Produces a prioritized risk report. Use this skill when the user asks to "investigate code", "audit project", "find risks", "check code quality", "analyze codebase", "what's wrong with this code", "project health check", "code review entire project", "find dead code", "find redundant code", or any request for a thorough codebase analysis.
Clean Code practices for TypeScript/JavaScript. Identify code smells, apply refactoring patterns, and write maintainable code. Use when reviewing code quality, refactoring messy code, or ensuring code follows best practices. Triggers on requests like "clean up this code", "refactor for readability", "identify code smells", or "make this more maintainable".