Loading...
Loading...
Found 3,211 Skills
Issue Workflow Stage 3——Fix code precisely based on confirmed root cause and solution, verify the effect, and document it in {slug}-fix-note.md. This is the final stage of the issue workflow—no verification loop means the workflow is incomplete. Two entry points: the standard path is triggered from easysdd-issue-analyze (with existing {slug}-analysis.md), and the quick path is triggered directly from easysdd-issue-report (without {slug}-analysis.md, as the root cause was determined by AI reading code during the report stage). Trigger scenarios: user says 'Start fixing the bug', 'Fix according to analysis', 'Start modifying code'. During repair, only modify the files stated in the solution; do not optimize casually or introduce new abstractions—these actions will make the scope spread to untraceable levels.
Onboard a new repository or a repository with scattered documents into the easysdd system. Two paths are automatically determined: the empty repository path (no spec-like documents or easysdd/ directory in the repository) builds the skeleton from scratch; the migration path (the repository already has scattered documents or partial easysdd/ structure) first generates an audit report + migration mapping plan, which is confirmed by the user one by one before implementation. This skill only does two things: "build the skeleton" and "organize existing documents". After the skeleton is built, all sub-workflows can run directly. Trigger scenarios: the user says "Use easysdd in this project", "Build easysdd structure", "Initialize easysdd", "Migrate to easysdd".
Extracts the behavioral requirements, user experience (UX) flows, micro-interactions, and conditional visibility rules of a frontend component from its source code. Produces an experience.md file focused on "how it feels, behaves, and when it renders".
Phase 3 of the issue workflow —— Fix code precisely according to confirmed root causes and solutions, verify the results, and document it in {slug}-fix-note.md. This is the final stage of the issue workflow —— no verification closure means the workflow is incomplete. Two entry points: the standard path is triggered from cs-issue-analyze (with existing {slug}-analysis.md), and the fast track is triggered directly from cs-issue-report (without {slug}-analysis.md, as the root cause was identified by AI through code reading during the report phase). Trigger scenarios: User says "Start fixing the bug", "Fix according to the analysis", "Start modifying the code". During the fix, only modify the files specified in the solution; do not make incidental optimizations or introduce new abstractions —— these actions will cause the scope to expand to an untraceable extent.
Low-token index of deep Taubyte references by topic (commands, Dream, SDK, build/logs, deployment) for selective loading.
Applies targeted improvements to an existing pm-skills skill based on feedback, validation reports, or convention changes. Reads current files, previews proposed changes, writes on confirmation, and suggests a version bump. Use when improving a skill after validation or feedback.
Sync verified experiment results from the code repo or a code worktree into the paper's daily experiments log and project memory. Use when results in code/docs/results, code/docs/reports, code/docs/runs, worktree docs, logs, or user-confirmed metrics should be promoted into paper-facing evidence.
Standardize the article editing process to ensure clear modification scope, trackable progress, and documented changes. Use this skill when the user says "edit article", "revise article", "adjust content", or "modify this piece".
Create an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) in canonical MADR v4 format capturing the why behind a significant technical choice. Use when user says 'document this decision', 'create an ADR', 'record architecture decision', 'why did we choose X', 'document the rationale', or when adding major dependencies, new frameworks, or changing fundamental patterns. Do NOT use for user-facing feature docs (use document-feature) or syncing existing docs (use update-doc).
Interactive workflow for creating new skills for the skills-il organization. Guides through category selection, use case definition, folder scaffolding, metadata.json generation with bilingual metadata, instruction writing, Hebrew companion creation, and validation. Use when user asks to create a new skill, scaffold a skill for skills-il, write a SKILL.md, contribute a skill, new skill template, or liztor skill chadash. Enforces skills-il conventions (kebab-case naming, Hebrew transliterations, bilingual display names, progressive disclosure, validate-skill.sh compliance). Do NOT use for editing existing skills, creating skills for non-skills-il platforms, or generic markdown file creation.
Fast, zero-friction capture of technical findings from the current conversation to the wiki's _raw/ staging area. Use this skill when the user says "/wiki-quick-chat-capture", "quick capture", "capture this finding", "save this bug fix", "capture this gotcha", "drop this to raw", "quick save to wiki", or wants to capture a non-obvious discovery mid-session without a full wiki-ingest run. Writes one _raw/ file per topic cluster in under 60 seconds — no subagents, no QMD updates, no manifest writes. Run /wiki-ingest or /data-ingest later to promote raw files to proper wiki pages.
Certification coach for Flows apps. Captures the app name, value case, persona, problem, and design intent through a structured conversation and writes App-Brief.md at the repo root. This is the FIRST step of the Flows app certification flow — run it immediately after `npx @cognite/cli apps create`, before building. Use when the user asks to start an app brief, run the certification coach, fill out the app brief, or run flows-app-brief.