Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,943 Skills
Review code for quality, maintainability, and correctness. Use when reviewing pull requests, evaluating code changes, or providing feedback on implementations. Focuses on API design, patterns, and actionable feedback.
Senior SaaS CFO / Financial Analyst (15+ years) specialized in financial modeling, projections, and exit strategy for bootstrapped and VC-backed SaaS companies. Activate when user needs: (1) Revenue projections (1-5 years), (2) Exit valuation and multiples, (3) Unit economics analysis (CAC, LTV, payback), (4) Scenario modeling (conservative/base/optimistic), (5) Fundraising narratives with financial backing, (6) M&A due diligence financials, (7) SaaS metrics benchmarking, (8) Cohort analysis and churn modeling. Triggers: "proyecciones", "projections", "exit", "valuation", "ARR", "MRR", "multiples", "revenue forecast", "financial model", "exit strategy", "CAC", "LTV", "unit economics", "churn", "fundraising", "M&A", "acquisition", "5 year plan".
Score assistant responses for clarity on a strict 1-5 scale, then return strict JSON only with score, rationale, and improvement suggestions. Use when the user asks to evaluate clarity, grade clarity, or critique clarity quality.
Critically review terminal user interfaces for UX quality, responsiveness, visual design, and interactivity. Use when asked to "review my TUI", "test my TUI UX", "audit my terminal UI", "check TUI responsiveness", "review TUI keybindings", "check interactivity", or any request to evaluate the user experience quality of a ratatui/crossterm/ncurses-based terminal application. Launches the TUI in tmux, systematically tests 10 dimensions (responsiveness, input conflicts, visual clarity, navigation, feedback loops, error states, layout, keyboard design, permission flows, visual design & color), and produces a graded report with screenshots and specific findings. Benchmarks against Claude Code, OpenCode, and Codex — the three best-in-class AI terminal UIs.
Evaluate designs for usability, visual hierarchy, consistency, and adherence to design principles. Trigger with "what do you think of this design", "give me feedback on", "critique this", "review this mockup", or when the user shares a design and asks for opinions.
Evaluate and validate Claude Code rules in .claude/rules/ directories. Use when auditing rule file quality, validating frontmatter and glob patterns, or checking rules organization before deployment. Do not use when writing new rules from scratch - use rule authoring guides instead. Do not use when evaluating skills or hooks - use skills-eval or hooks-eval instead.
Audit an LLM eval pipeline and surface problems: missing error analysis, unvalidated judges, vanity metrics, etc. Use when inheriting an eval system, when unsure whether evals are trustworthy, or as a starting point when no eval infrastructure exists. Do NOT use when the goal is to build a new evaluator from scratch (use error-analysis, write-judge-prompt, or validate-evaluator instead).
Meta-prompting framework for critiquing responses, analyzing solution trajectories, and evaluating AI-generated content quality
Systematic LLM prompt engineering: analyzes existing prompts for failure modes, generates structured variants (direct, few-shot, chain-of-thought), designs evaluation rubrics with weighted criteria, and produces test case suites for comparing prompt performance. Triggers on: "prompt engineering", "prompt lab", "generate prompt variants", "A/B test prompts", "evaluate prompt", "optimize prompt", "write a better prompt", "prompt design", "prompt iteration", "few-shot examples", "chain-of-thought prompt", "prompt failure modes", "improve this prompt". Use this skill when designing, improving, or evaluating LLM prompts specifically. NOT for evaluating Claude Code skills or SKILL.md files — use skill-evaluator instead.
Define the design rules (Skill Laws) that all Skills must follow, including core principles such as AI-first, human-centric, and ready-to-use. When to use: When users create a new Skill, optimize an existing Skill, ask about Skill design specifications, or need to evaluate Skill quality.
General-purpose NocoBase reference utilities covering cross-cutting topics such as evaluator engines, expression syntax, and more. Use when you need authoritative reference information that applies across multiple NocoBase features.
Complete reference for the Galileo AI platform Python SDK for evaluating, observing, and protecting GenAI applications. Use when building Python applications that need LLM evaluation, production observability, tracing, or runtime guardrails with Galileo.