Loading...
Loading...
Found 239 Skills
Annie Duke's Decision Quality framework applied to a business decision. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Resulting Auditor, Calibrator, Pre-Mortem Analyst, Quit Strategist, Process Architect — who each apply a distinct lens from Duke's framework to evaluate whether a decision is sound regardless of outcome. The lead synthesizes into a stacking analysis: which biases are operating, which process flaws exist, and the honest Duke verdict. Use when the user says "duke this", "is this a good bet", "should I quit", "evaluate this decision", or faces any high-stakes choice under uncertainty and wants rigorous decision-process analysis. Works as a standalone analysis or after /office-hours.
Guide a focused CS or AI literature review sprint that turns a topic, idea, claim, or project direction into a ranked paper map, closest-work risk assessment, method taxonomy, novelty implications, baseline implications, and next actions. Use this skill whenever the user needs to survey a topic, check novelty, map related work, prepare a project, find canonical or recent papers, decide read/skim/ignore priority, or turn papers into a research direction.
CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Three modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials).
Termination review — high-risk flag detection, severance + release, and final pay timing by jurisdiction. Jurisdiction-specific rules and release consideration periods are researched per review, not stored. Use when the user says "reviewing a termination", "can we fire this person", "term review", or describes a termination scenario.
Evaluate product bets and shape pitches using Shape Up's appetite model and Bezos's Type 1/Type 2 decision framework. Use when asked to assess a product bet, evaluate initiative risk, decide resource allocation, or shape a pitch for a new feature or project.
Comprehensive review of staged Git changes for risk assessment, error detection, and impact analysis. Use when the user wants to review staged changes, check for errors before commit, analyze risks in git staged files, validate code changes before committing, or needs suggestions on staged modifications.
Evaluate pricing changes using financial impact analysis - ARPU/ARPA, conversion, churn risk, NRR, and payback. Recommends go/no-go on pricing decisions.
Final pass to identify missed items, edge cases, and risks before considering a scope done
When the user wants to assess supplier risks, monitor supplier health, or develop risk mitigation strategies. Also use when the user mentions "supplier risk assessment," "supply chain risk," "business continuity," "supplier monitoring," "supply disruption," "risk scoring," "supplier financial health," or "contingency planning." For initial supplier selection, see supplier-selection. For overall supply chain risk, see risk-mitigation.
Use when running the full dependency update pipeline for a repo — scan, risk-eval, build-test, and merge-decision.
Individual project health assessment skill for evaluating project status across multiple dimensions. Provides early warning of troubled projects.