Loading...
Loading...
Found 920 Skills
Validate specifications, implementations, constitution compliance, or understanding. Includes spec quality checks, drift detection, and constitution enforcement.
Comprehensive multi-stage code review using specialized subagents. Use when reviewing PRs with complex architectural impact, security concerns, or when thorough multi-perspective analysis is needed.
Domain modeling principles: parse-don't-validate, make invalid states unrepresentable, primitive obsession detection, semantic types, and domain veto authority. Activate when designing types, reviewing code for domain integrity, or when domain review is needed in a TDD cycle.
Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.
Applies a modified Fagan Inspection methodology to systematically resolve persistent bugs and complex issues. Use when multiple previous fix attempts have failed repeatedly, when dealing with intricate system interactions, or when a methodical root cause analysis is needed. Do not use for simple troubleshooting. Triggers after multiple failed debugging attempts on the same complex issue.
Refactoring using Extract Methods in Java Language
SOLID principles for Ruby 3.3+ and Rails 8. Files < 100 lines, contracts separated, modular architecture. Modules MANDATORY.
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Practices: receiving feedback, requesting reviews, verification gates. Capabilities: technical evaluation, evidence-based claims, PR review, subagent-driven review, completion verification. Actions: review, evaluate, verify, validate code changes. Keywords: code review, PR review, pull request, technical feedback, review feedback, completion claim, verification, evidence-based, code quality, review request, technical rigor, subagent review, code-reviewer, review gate, merge criteria. Use when: receiving code review feedback, completing major features, making completion claims, requesting systematic reviews, validating before merge, preventing false completion claims.
Prepare R packages for CRAN submission by checking for common ad-hoc requirements not caught by devtools::check(). Use when: (1) Preparing a package for first CRAN release, (2) Preparing a package update for CRAN resubmission, (3) Reviewing a package to ensure CRAN compliance, (4) Responding to CRAN reviewer feedback. Covers documentation requirements, DESCRIPTION field standards, URL validation, examples, and administrative requirements.
Audit rapidly generated or AI-produced code for structural flaws, fragility, and production risks.
Apply feedback and implement review suggestions. Incorporates reviewer comments into code changes systematically.
Systematic OSS release preparation checklist. Use when preparing a repository for open-source publishing, making a project public, or ensuring a repo meets OSS standards. Triggers: "prepare for OSS", "ready to publish", "make this public", "OSS checklist", "scan repo for publish", "open source this", "/oss-release-prep"