Loading...
Loading...
Found 18 Skills
Analyze an influencer's recent content and return a brand safety report flagging political controversy, offensive language, sensitive topics, or past scandal indicators. This skill should be used when screening a creator for brand safety, vetting influencer content for risks, checking if a creator is brand-safe, auditing an influencer's content history for red flags, running a brand safety check on a creator, evaluating creator risk before a partnership, flagging controversial creator content, reviewing an influencer for offensive language or sensitive topics, or doing a pre-campaign safety review. For holistic creator evaluation including performance metrics, see creator-vetting-scorecard. For writing campaign briefs with content guidelines and safety clauses, see campaign-brief-generator.
Generates WAFFLES Declarations for social media posts — preemptive lists of what a post does NOT say. Use when users mention WAFFLES, ask for clarifications on their post, want to prevent misinterpretation, or request disclaimers for controversial/nuanced takes.
Use when you have a single piece of content (blog post, talk, case study, docs PR) and want to extract multiple content angles from it — abstraction ladders, audience pivots, controversy checks, and hidden assumptions that could each become their own piece.
Generate realistic coach/player interview responses for wins, losses, controversies, injuries. Authentic coachspeak and player personalities.
Systematic Learning Material Generator. Given a new field/technology/concept, AI conducts independent research, builds a knowledge system, and generates HTML learning materials (including framework/cases/engineering/controversies + blind spots). Triggered when the user says "I want to learn X / Help me systematically break down X / I want to master the field of X / Help me organize the full picture of X / Conduct in-depth research on X and explain it systematically / Master X thoroughly". Not applicable for "Is X feasible / Why Y" (use long-research), "What interesting cases are there in X" (use case-radar for scattered cases), "Organize these materials into HTML" (use readable-output to process existing materials), article writing (use writing-assistant), design drafts (use design-exploration).
The point-of-view content type — articulate, sharpen, and argue a genuinely-held contrarian stance / hot take / opinion / thought-leadership position that builds authority and real debate. Use when someone wants a POV, a hot take, an "unpopular opinion", a contrarian angle, an opinion piece, or to stop sounding like everyone else and build thought leadership. Uses the STAND framework. Reads brand-profile + voice-builder first. The agent argues the human's OWN opinion with evidence; the human owns the stance and the live debate; WoopSocial publishes. Never manufactures a stance, controversy, or ragebait; no strawmen, punching down, or defamation; opinion stays clearly opinion and factual claims must be true. Distinct from hook-writer (the opening-line mechanic this feeds), educational-content-and-how-to (teaches a process), storytelling-and-narrative (narrative vs argument), and behind-the-scenes-and-founder (personal story vs argued position).