Loading...
Loading...
Found 20 Skills
Search PubMed for meta-analyses on a given medical topic using NCBI E-utilities API
Synthesize evidence into a structured narrative (`output/SYNTHESIS.md`) grounded in `papers/extraction_table.csv`, including limitations and bias considerations. **Trigger**: synthesis, evidence synthesis, systematic review writing, 综合写作, SYNTHESIS.md. **Use when**: systematic review 完成 screening+extraction（含 bias 评估）后进入写作阶段（C4）。 **Skip if**: 还没有 `papers/extraction_table.csv`（或 protocol/screening 尚未完成）。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 以 extraction table 为证据底座；明确局限性与偏倚；不要在无数据支撑时扩写结论。
Design and execute reproducible systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and other evidence synthesis processes. Use when the user asks for "conduct a systematic review", "how to conduct a scoping review", "design a screening process", or requests the rw-review-methods workflow. Runs without a private local workspace or preset research-lab; use user-provided material and bundled public-source methods.
Use when formulating clinical research questions (PICOT framework), evaluating health evidence quality (study design hierarchy, bias assessment, GRADE), prioritizing patient-important outcomes, conducting systematic reviews or meta-analyses, creating evidence summaries for guidelines, assessing regulatory evidence, or when user mentions clinical trials, evidence-based medicine, health research methodology, systematic reviews, research protocols, or study quality assessment.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
Complete literature retrieval capability combining search and filter skills. LOAD THIS SKILL WHEN: User needs "文獻檢索", "找文獻", "retrieve literature", "系統性搜尋" | starting systematic review | comprehensive literature search. CAPABILITIES: Multi-database search, MeSH expansion, quality filtering, PRISMA-compliant workflow. COMPOSITE SKILL: Combines literature-search + literature-filter.
13 deep research & systematic reviews skills. Trigger: systematic reviews, multi-source synthesis, comprehensive literature surveys. Design: multi-step research protocols with quality assessment and evidence grading.
Use this when the user explicitly requests 'systematic literature review/literature review/related work/literature research' or requests the old name systematic-literature-review skill. The AI first generates and explicitly saves 5–25 search queries, then performs multi-source retrieval, deduplication, semantic scoring of each paper, paper selection, word count budgeting, and expert writing, with mandatory citation verification and export to PDF and Word; it stops by default when queries are missing or invalid, and does not silently degrade to single query. Supports en/zh/ja/de/fr/es.