Loading...
Loading...
Found 32 Skills
将原始研究问题细化为结构化的深度研究任务。通过提问澄清需求，生成符合 OpenAI/Google Deep Research 标准的结构化提示词，完全替代 ChatGPT 的问题细化功能。当用户提出研究问题、需要帮助定义研究范围、或想要生成结构化研究提示词时使用此技能。
Coordinate a research task by choosing the right workflow and dispatching to specialized agents. Use when the user has a broad or complex research request that may involve multiple steps.
Research a topic in depth using web search, academic papers, and citation graphs. Use when the user asks to research, investigate, or explore a topic thoroughly.
Conduct a systematic literature review on an academic topic. Use when the user asks for a literature review, survey, or systematic overview of a research area.
Verify a specific claim by searching for evidence across web and academic sources. Use when the user asks to verify, fact-check, or confirm a statement.
Complex research requiring deeper analysis, multi-step reasoning, and sophisticated source evaluation for technical, academic, or specialized domain queries needing expert-level analysis, high-stakes decisions, or multi-layered problem solving.
Use this skill to research markets, understand trends, find opportunities, and validate ideas. Triggers: "market research", "market analysis", "market opportunity", "market size", "TAM SAM SOM", "industry analysis", "market trends", "validate idea", "market validation", "customer research", "market sizing", "opportunity analysis" Outputs: Market report with size, trends, opportunities, competitive landscape.
Highest level of research and reasoning capabilities for complex decision-making with significant consequences, strategic planning, technical architecture decisions, multi-stakeholder problems, or high-complexity troubleshooting requiring expert-level judgment and sophisticated reasoning chains. Prioritizes actively maintained repositories and validates website sources for 2025 relevance.
Multi-model consensus council for validation, research, and brainstorming. Spawns parallel judges with configurable perspectives and optional explorer sub-agents using runtime-native backends (Codex sub-agents or Claude teams). Modes: validate, brainstorm, research. Triggers: council, validate, brainstorm, critique, research, analyze, multi-model, consensus.
Conduct Neovim configuration research using plugin docs and codebase exploration. Invoke for neovim research tasks.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
Web search and research using Perplexity AI. Use when user says "search", "find", "look up", "ask", "research", or "what's the latest" for generic queries. NOT for library/framework docs (use Context7) or workspace questions.