Loading...
Loading...
Found 206 Skills
Trigger when the user requests a review of frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Support both pending-change reviews and focused file reviews while applying the checklist rules.
Validate whether an implementation matches its stated goal. Use this skill when a skill or agent wants a second opinion on its own output, when the user says "check this implementation", "validate what you did", "is this correct?", "review the output", or "did you do this right?". Also spawned automatically as a subagent by other skills (memory-bridge, daily-update) to self-check their outputs before presenting to the user. Returns a structured pass/warn/fail verdict with specific actionable issues.
PRD review, requirements review, check PRD quality. Use when: Review is required after PRD completion, "review PRD", "PRD review", "requirements review"
Loads org- and repo-level coding rules from Qodo before code tasks begin, ensuring all generation and modification follows team standards. Use before any code generation or modification task when rules are not already loaded. Invoke when user asks to write, edit, refactor, or review code, or when starting implementation planning.
Generates eval test cases from an eval suite plan (output of /eval-suite-planner) or a plain-English agent description. Supports both single-response and conversation (multi-turn) evaluation modes. Outputs a Copilot Studio test set table, a CSV file for import (single-response only), and a docx report for human review.
Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.
Ensure .NET/C# code meets best practices for the solution/project.
Use when building features with **Cursor** in any codebase and the work should go through a disciplined build → review → test → fix loop. Triggers on "run the build loop", "build the next task", "continue the plan", "build this feature properly", or any request to implement work from a plan file or a direct feature prompt. Builds from the plan (or the prompt if no plan exists), runs Cursor's `/review` and fixes every issue found, tests and verifies the feature end to end, fixes anything testing surfaces, and reports back once complete. Repeats until all plan tasks are checked off.
Use when the user asks for a code review by a fleet of specialized reviewer agents, wants multiple independent reviewer perspectives, or asks to run reviewers in single-pass or iterative fix-until-clean mode. Launches focused subagents for correctness, security, architecture, conventions, simplicity, UX, reliability, telemetry, testing, compatibility, and documentation review.
Eval enablement accelerator — help customers think through "what does good look like" for their AI agent, then generate a structured eval plan and test cases they can use immediately. No running agent required. Works from a description, an idea, or even a vague goal. Use when anyone mentions agent evaluation, eval planning, "what should we test", "how do we know if the agent is good", test case generation, or interpreting eval results.
Pre-launch checklist for shipping a new website. Orchestrates analytics setup (GA4, PostHog, Google Search Console, Ahrefs), legal compliance, security headers and audit, SEO and GEO with keyword research validated against Google Trends (robots.txt, sitemaps, llms.txt, AI policy, schema markup, hreflang), copywriting consistency via a TONE.md and a humanizer pass in the matching language, OpenGraph and social previews, full favicon set with manifest, quality gates (Lighthouse, Core Web Vitals, WCAG accessibility, mobile testing), and setup of a weekly SEO agent. Use this skill whenever the user mentions launching a site/app, deploying a domain to production, pre-launch audit, shipping a marketing/docs/SaaS site or lead magnet, or says "checklist for the site", "ready to ship", "before I go live", "audit before launch", "ready for prod", or asks for a site review.
Respond to PR review comments with critical evaluation. Use when addressing code review feedback, responding to bot review comments (Gemini Code Assist, CodeRabbit, etc.), or handling PR suggestions. Fetches comments, evaluates each against project context, applies valid fixes, declines invalid suggestions with reasoning, and posts responses.